PURPOSE: Research has shown that the prevalence of vision difficulty is higher among US adults with low income than among those with higher income. We aimed to examine the trends in income-related inequalities in vision difficulty and to identify the contributions of explanatory factors. DESIGN: A cross-sectional and trend study. METHODS: Our study estimated income-related inequalities in self-reported vision difficulty among US adults aged 18 years or older using data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) during 1999-2018. The concentration index was used to measure income-related inequality in vision difficulty and was decomposed into contributing factors. We examined temporal changes in income-related vision difficulty inequalities and contributors to those changes from 1999 to 2018. RESULTS: We found that vision difficulty was concentrated among lower income groups and the degree of income-related inequality in vision difficulty widened between 1999 and 2018. Decomposition analysis revealed that poverty-to-income ratio and public health insurance coverage were important contributors to income-related inequalities in vision difficulty, with smaller contributions made by smoking, physical inactivity, and female sex. Among all variables, non-White race/ethnicity, lower physical activity, and poverty-to-income ratio were important factors explaining the change in income-related inequality in vision difficulty. CONCLUSION: Vision difficulty was more prevalent in low-income populations. Our study enhances the understanding of socioeconomic disparities in vision difficulty, which could inform how to best target the deployment of eye care resources to maximize the visual potential of the US population.

IMPORTANCE: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide and, in the US, disproportionately affects people from racial and ethnic minority groups. Glaucoma prevalence has not been estimated for the US in more than a decade, and state- and county-level estimates are not available. OBJECTIVE: To estimate glaucoma and vision-affecting glaucoma prevalence by demographic factors and US state and county for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Vision and Eye Health Surveillance System (VEHSS). DATA SOURCES: This meta-analysis used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2005-2008), Medicare fee-for-service claims (2019), IBM MarketScan commercial insurance claims (2016), population-based studies of eye disease (1985-2003), and 2022 population estimates from the US Census Bureau. STUDY SELECTION: PubMed was searched for population-based studies of glaucoma prevalence published between 1991 and 2016. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Bayesian meta-regression methods were used to estimate the prevalence of glaucoma and vision-affecting glaucoma stratified by age, undifferentiated sex/gender (a measure that captures an unclear mix of aspects of sex and or gender), race and ethnicity, and US county and state. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence of any type of glaucoma (open or closed angle) among people 18 years or older and vision-affecting glaucoma, defined as glaucoma and a visual field abnormality. RESULTS: For 2022, an estimated 4.22 million people (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 3.46 million to 5.23 million) in the US were living with glaucoma, with a prevalence of 1.62% (UI, 1.33%-2.00%) among people 18 years or older and 2.56% (UI, 2.10%-3.16%) among people 40 years or older. An estimated 1.49 million people (UI, 1.17 million to 1.90 million) were living with vision-affecting glaucoma, with a prevalence of 0.57% (UI, 0.45%-0.73%) among people 18 years or older and 0.91% (UI, 0.71%-1.16%) among people 40 years or older. Prevalence of glaucoma among people 18 years or older ranged from 1.11% (UI, 0.89%-1.40%) in Utah to 1.95% (UI, 1.57%-2.39%) in Mississippi. Black adults had a prevalence of 3.15% (UI, 2.32%-4.09%) compared with 1.42% (UI, 1.10%-1.85%) among White adults; adults in the Hispanic and all other racial and ethnic categories combined had a prevalence of 1.56% (UI, 1.13%-2.06%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This meta-analysis found that an estimated 2.56% of people 40 years or older have glaucoma, slightly more than estimated by previous studies. Black individuals are disproportionately affected. Prevalence estimates at the state and county level can help guide public health planning.

PURPOSE: To study contemporary trends in the diagnosed prevalence and incidence of age-related eye diseases among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries. DESIGN: Analysis of Medicare administrative claims data. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare FFS beneficiaries aged 68 and older from 2005-2020. Those included were continuously enrolled in both Part A and Part B for 3 years, including the index year and 2-year lookback period. METHODS: Annual cross-sectional diagnosed prevalence and incidence rates were calculated. Age-standardization was performed using the direct standardization method to account for changes in the age-structure of the study population. Rates stratified by demographics (age, sex, race, and ethnicity) were also calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual prevalence and incidence of diagnosed age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR) (among those with diabetes), and glaucoma. RESULTS: At baseline, in 2005, 60% of included beneficiaries were female, 20% were aged ≥85, 86% were non-Hispanic White, and one-quarter had diabetes. From 2005-2019, the prevalence of a diagnosis of any of the conditions studied increased from 15.0% (N=3,312,812) to 17.9% (N=3,731,281). Diagnosed incidence decreased over this period from 4.7% (N=917,846) in 2005 to 4.2% in 2019 (N=757,696). The diagnosed prevalence of AMD increased from 6.8% (N=1,504,770) to 9.4% (N=1,965,176); the diagnosed prevalence of any DR among those with diabetes decreased from 9.3% (N= 504,135) to 9.0% (N=532,859), though the diagnosed prevalence of vision-threatening DR increased from 2.0% to 3.4%; and the diagnosed prevalence of any diagnosed glaucoma decreased from 8.8% (N= 1,951,141) to 8.1% (N= 1,692,837). In 2020, the diagnosed prevalence and incidence of all diagnoses decreased. During the study period we detected demographic differences in the prevalence and incidence of diagnosis of each condition. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents updated data on the prevalence and incidence of diagnosed major chronic, age-related eye diseases among Medicare FFS beneficiaries. Compared to older epidemiological estimates, we found that the diagnosed prevalence of each condition studied was higher in more recent years. These findings may inform public health and policy planning and resource allocation to address the eye health of an increasingly older US population.

OBJECTIVE: Examine the 10-year trend in the prevalence and treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) among commercially insured adults with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed the 10-year trend (2009-2018) in health care claims for adults aged 18-64 years using the IBM MarketScan Database, a national convenience sample of employer-sponsored health insurance. We included patients continuously enrolled in commercial fee-for-service health insurance for 24 months who had a diabetes ICD-9/10-CM code on one or more inpatient or two or more different-day outpatient claims in the index year or previous calendar year. We used diagnosis and procedure codes to calculate the annual prevalence of patients with one or more claims for 1) any DME, 2) either DME or VTDR, and 3) antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections and laser photocoagulation treatment, stratified by any DME, VTDR with DME, and VTDR without DME. We calculated the average annual percent change (AAPC). RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, there was an increase in the annual prevalence of patients with DME or VTDR (2.1% to 3.4%; AAPC 7.5%; P < 0.001) and any DME (0.7% to 2.6%; AAPC 19.8%; P < 0.001). There were sex differences in the annual prevalence of DME or VTDR and any DME, with men having a higher prevalence than women. Annual claims for anti-VEGF injections increased among patients with any DME (327%) and VTDR with DME (206%); laser photocoagulation decreased among patients with any DME (-68%), VTDR with DME (-54%), and VTDR without DME (-62%). CONCLUSIONS: Annual claims for DME or VTDR and anti-VEGF injections increased whereas those for laser photocoagulation decreased among commercially insured adults with diabetes.

IMPORTANCE: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of vision loss and blindness. AMD prevalence has not been estimated for the US in over a decade and early-stage AMD prevalence estimates are scarce and inconsistently measured. OBJECTIVE: To produce estimates of early- and late-stage AMD prevalence overall and by age, gender, race and ethnicity, county, and state. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study team conducted a bayesian meta-regression analysis of relevant data sources containing information on the prevalence of AMD among different population groups in the US. DATA SOURCES: We included data from the American Community Survey (2019), the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2005-2008), US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims for fee-for-service beneficiaries (2018), and population-based studies (2004-2016). STUDY SELECTION: We included all relevant data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Vision and Eye Health Surveillance System. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The prevalence of early- and late-stage AMD was estimated and stratified when possible by factors including county, age group, gender, and race and ethnicity. Data analysis occurred from June 2021 to April 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES OR MEASURES: The prevalence of early- (defined as retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities or the presence of drusen 125 or more microns in diameter in either eye) and late-stage (defined as choroidal neovascularization and/or geographic atrophy in either eye) manifestations of AMD. RESULTS: This study used data from nationally representative and local population-based studies that represent the populations in which they were conducted. For 2019, we estimated that there were 18.34 million people 40 years and older (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 15.30-22.03) living with early-stage AMD, corresponding to a crude prevalence rate of 11.64% (95% UI, 9.71-13.98). We estimated there were 1.49 million people 40 years and older (95% UI, 0.97-2.15) living with late-stage AMD, corresponding to a crude prevalence rate of 0.94% (95% UI, 0.62-1.36). Prevalence rates of early- and late-stage AMD varied by demographic characteristics and geography. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We estimated a higher prevalence of early-stage AMD and a similar prevalence of late-stage AMD as compared with earlier studies. State-level and county-level AMD estimates may help guide public health practice.

Purpose: Examine the relationship between vision impairment and psychological distress in adults ≥18 years.Methods: Using the 2016-2017 cross-sectional, U.S. National Health Interview Survey, we analyzed self-reported data (n = 57,644) on: Kessler psychological distress scores; general vision impairment (GVI), defined as difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses or contacts; and visual function impairment (VFI), measured using six visual function questions. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for mild/moderate and serious psychological distress, by GVI and VFI status, and identify predictors of psychological distress among those with GVI or VFI.Results: Among adults, 10.6% (95% CI: 10.2, 11.0) had GVI; 11.6% (CI: 11.1, 12.0) had VFI. One in four adults with GVI had psychological distress (14.9% [CI: 13.8, 16.0] reported mild/moderate and 11.2% [CI: 10.2, 12.3] reported serious). Individuals with GVI, versus those without, had higher odds of mild/moderate (aOR = 2.24; CI: 2.00, 2.52) and serious (aOR = 3.41; CI: 2.96, 3.93) psychological distress; VFI had similar findings. Among adults with GVI, odds of serious psychological distress were higher for those aged 18-39 (aOR = 4.46; CI: 2.89, 6.90) or 40-64 (aOR = 6.09; CI: 4.33, 8.57) versus ≥65 years; smokers (aOR = 2.45; CI: 1.88, 3.18) versus non-smokers; physically inactive (aOR = 1.61; CI: 1.22, 2.11) versus active; and with arthritis (aOR = 2.18; CI: 1.66, 2.87) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aOR = 1.65; CI: 1.15, 2.37) versus without.Conclusion: Adults with self-reported vision impairment had higher odds of psychological distress. These findings may inform screening interventions to address psychological distress, particularly among younger working-age adults vision impairment.

Vision impairment affects approximately 3.22 million persons in the United States and is associated with social isolation, disability, and decreased quality of life (1). Cognitive decline is more common in adults with vision impairment (2,3). Subjective cognitive decline (SCD), which is the self-reported experience of worsening or more frequent confusion or memory loss within the past 12 months, affects 11.2% of adults aged >/=45 years in the United States (4). One consequence of SCD is the occurrence of functional limitations, especially those related to usual daily activities; however, it is not known whether persons with vision impairment are more likely to have functional limitations related to SCD (4). This report describes the association of vision impairment and SCD-related functional limitations using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys for the years 2015-2017. Adjusting for age group, sex, race/ethnicity, education level, health insurance, and smoking status, 18% of adults aged >/=45 years who reported vision impairment also reported SCD-related functional limitations, compared with only 4% of those without vision impairment. Preventing, reducing, and correcting vision impairments might lead to a decrease in SCD-related functional limitations among adults in the United States.