Last data update: Mar 17, 2025. (Total: 48910 publications since 2009)
Records 1-1 (of 1 Records) |
Query Trace: Ehrenberg RL[original query] |
---|
A decision process for determining whether to conduct responder health research following large disasters
Decker JA , Keifer M , Reissman DB , Funk R , Halpin J , Bernard B , Ehrenberg RL , Schuler CR , Whelan E , Myers K , Howard J . Am J Disaster Med 2013 8 (1) 25-33 Disasters often set the stage for scientific inquiry within the fieid of occupational safety and health. This is especially true when the long-term consequences of exposures associated with a particular disaster are unclear. However, a responder research study can be costly and difficult to design, and researchers must consider whether the proposed study will produce useful, reliable results and is a prudent public health investment. The decision process can be segregated into various components, including scientific rationale that should be formally recognized as critical to efficiently and effectively determine whether a research study is warranted. The scientific rationale includes certain controlling or "gatekeeper" factors that should be present to proceed with research. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Mar 17, 2025
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure