BACKGROUND: Proficiency testing (PT) can have regulatory and nonregulatory uses, providing an effective tool for quality improvement. Clinical laboratories were surveyed to determine how they perceive PT and how they use PT results and materials to improve laboratory testing quality. METHODS: All laboratories certified to perform nonwaived testing under the CLIA regulations expected to perform required PT were invited to participate in the survey. We examined respondents' use of PT from 5 laboratory types: hospital, independent, public health, physician office, and "all other." Respondents' awareness of resources about PT was also examined. Several questions allowed responses on a categorical scale. RESULTS: Varying proportions of the respondents (n = 769) used PT to identify problems in the preanalytic (48%), analytic (86%), and postanalytic (76%) phases of testing. Responses also showed that PT was important for demonstrating personnel competency (93%), inappropriate specimen handling (80%), incorrect result interpretation (84%), and other uses. Respodents purchased PT even when not required to do so (77%). Based on all responses, most considered PT worth the cost (65%). CONCLUSIONS: Laboratories, regardless of type, have found ways of using leftover PT samples and the information from PT event summaries to help improve laboratory quality. Our findings suggest many laboratories are not taking full advantage of PT to improve testing quality. Additionally, the study suggests a need to improve awareness of resources about PT.

As an external assessment of quality, proficiency testing (PT) is recognized as one essential component for assuring quality testing in clinical laboratories.1–3 Each laboratory that performs non-waived testing is required by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) to perform PT. The CLIA regulations specify requirements for PT program provider approval by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). | | The CLIA law changed the paradigm for providers from an educational to a more regulatory role. Consequently, there are often misperceptions about providers’ operations and their limitations. This report presents some of the common viewpoints held by clinical laboratory professionals and the corresponding perspectives shared by some PT providers. The report is intended to assist clinical laboratories in understanding the constraints faced by PT program providers, learning about potentially helpful provider services, communicating with their providers, and making knowledgeable inquiries as they search for PT services. | | In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), working in collaboration with the Association of Public Health Laboratories, conducted a series of focus groups that included clinical and public health laboratory professionals to explore how they use and perceive PT.4–5 Some discussions concerned participants’ satisfaction with PT provider services. Participants spoke of issues they had experienced and made recommendations for providers to consider. As a follow-up to the focus groups, in 2015 CDC developed several open-ended questions about some of these issues and sent them to all 11 HHS-approved PT program providers that provide, at a minimum, chemistry analytes. Seven providers furnished either written or verbal answers, which are summarized in this article. Respondents included providers which offer a wide range of programs: programs affiliated with accreditation organizations; those that offer a small number of programs to specific types of laboratories (e.g. physician office laboratories); and some independent and state-affiliated programs.

PURPOSE: Many regions have implemented newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) using a limited panel of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) mutations after immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) analysis. We sought to assess the feasibility of further improving the screening using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. METHODS: An NGS assay was used to detect 162 CFTR mutations/variants characterized by the CFTR2 project. We used 67 dried blood spots (DBSs) containing 48 distinct CFTR mutations to validate the assay. NGS assay was retrospectively performed on 165 CF screen-positive samples with one CFTR mutation. RESULTS: The NGS assay was successfully performed using DNA isolated from DBSs, and it correctly detected all CFTR mutations in the validation. Among 165 screen-positive infants with one CFTR mutation, no additional disease-causing mutation was identified in 151 samples consistent with normal sweat tests. Five infants had a CF-causing mutation that was not included in this panel, and nine with two CF-causing mutations were identified. CONCLUSION: The NGS assay was 100% concordant with traditional methods. Retrospective analysis results indicate an IRT/NGS screening algorithm would enable high sensitivity, better specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). This study lays the foundation for prospective studies and for introducing NGS in NBS laboratories.

Most newborn screening (NBS) laboratories use second-tier molecular tests for cystic fibrosis (CF) using dried blood spots (DBS). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's NBS Quality Assurance Program offers proficiency testing (PT) in DBS for CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutation detection. Extensive molecular characterization on 76 CF patients, family members or screen positive newborns was performed for quality assurance. The coding, regulatory regions and portions of all introns were sequenced and large insertions/deletions were characterized as well as two intronic di-nucleotide microsatellites. For CF patient samples, at least two mutations were identified/verified and four specimens contained three likely CF-associated mutations. Thirty-four sequence variations in 152 chromosomes were identified, five of which were not previously reported. Twenty-seven of these variants were used to predict haplotypes from the major haplotype block defined by HapMap data that spans the promoter through intron 19. Chromosomes containing the F508del (p.Phe508del), G542X (p.Gly542X) and N1303K (p.Asn1303Lys) mutations shared a common haplotype subgroup, consistent with a common ancient European founder. Understanding the haplotype background of CF-associated mutations in the U.S. population provides a framework for future phenotype/genotype studies and will assist in determining a likely cis/trans phase of the mutations without need for parent studies.

BACKGROUND: CDC's Newborn Screening Quality Assurance Program collaborated with several U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Care Centers to collect specimens for development of a molecular CFTR proficiency testing program using dried-blood spots for newborn screening laboratories. METHODS: Adult and adolescent patients or carriers donated whole blood that was aliquoted onto filter paper cards. Five blind-coded specimens were sent to participating newborn screening laboratories quarterly. Proficiency testing results were evaluated based on presumptive clinical assessment. Individual evaluations and summary reports were sent to each participating laboratory and technical consultations were offered if incorrect assessments were reported. RESULTS: The current CDC repository contains specimens with 39 different CFTR mutations. Up to 45 laboratories have participated in the program. Three years of data showed that correct assessments were reported 97.7% of the time overall when both mutations could be determined. Incorrect assessments that could have lead to a missed case occurred 0.9% of the time, and no information was reported 1.1% of the time due to sample failure. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that laboratories using molecular assays to detect CFTR mutations are performing satisfactorily. The programmatic results presented demonstrate the importance and complexity of providing proficiency testing for DNA-based assays.