METHODS: Outpatient hemodialysis facilities report BSI events to NHSN. Pooled mean rates with 95% CI were calculated overall and for each type of vascular access (arteriovenous (AV) fistula, AV graft, or a central venous catheter (CVC)). Standardized infection ratios were calculated as observed BSI events divided by the predicted number of events based on national aggregate data. Median facility-level standardized infection ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were stratified by state and US territory. RESULTS: During 2020, 7,183 outpatient hemodialysis facilities reported data for 5,235,234 patient months with 15,181 BSI events. Pooled mean rates per 100 person-months were 0.29 (95% CI, 0.29-0.30) overall, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78-0.82) for CVC, 0.12 (95% CI, 0.12-0.12) for AV fistula, 0.21 (95% CI, 0.20-0.22) for AV graft, and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.19-0.40) for other access types. The national standardized infection ratio was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.39-0.41). South Dakota had a standardized infection ratio significantly higher than one (1.34; 95% CI, 1.11 - 1.62). Fifty-one of 54 states and territories had BSI standardized infection ratio significantly lower than one. CONCLUSIONS: In 2020, the median standardized infection ratio for BSI in US outpatient hemodialysis facilities was lower than predicted overall and in almost all states and territories. An elevated standardized infection ratio was identified in South Dakota.

Nursing home residents are at increased risk for developing severe COVID-19. Nursing homes report weekly facility-level data on SARS-CoV-2 infections, COVID-19-associated hospitalizations, and COVID-19 vaccination coverage among residents to CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network. This analysis describes rates of incident SARS-CoV-2 infection, rates of incident COVID-19-associated hospitalization, and COVID-19 vaccination coverage during October 16, 2023-February 11, 2024. Weekly rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection ranged from 61.4 to 133.8 per 10,000 nursing home residents. The weekly percentage of facilities reporting one or more incident SARS-CoV-2 infections ranged from 14.9% to 26.1%. Weekly rates of COVID-19-associated hospitalization ranged from 3.8 to 7.1 per 10,000 residents, and the weekly percentage of facilities reporting one or more COVID-19-associated hospitalizations ranged from 2.6% to 4.7%. By February 11, 2024, 40.5% of nursing home residents had received a dose of the updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine that was first recommended in September 2023. Although the peak rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection among nursing home residents was lower during the 2023-24 respiratory virus season than during the three previous respiratory virus seasons, nursing home residents continued to be disproportionately affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection and related severe outcomes. Vaccination coverage remains suboptimal in this population. Ongoing surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19-associated hospitalizations in this population is necessary to develop and evaluate evidence-based interventions for protecting nursing home residents.

A universal screening research study was conducted in six hospitals to identify the clinical sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on newborn dried blood spots (DBSs) versus saliva specimens for the diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV). CMV DNA positive results from DBSs or saliva were confirmed with urine testing. Findings of several false-positive (FP) saliva PCR results prompted an examination of a possible association with donor milk. Documentation of the frequency of positive saliva results, including both true-positive (TP) and FP status from clinical confirmation, occurred. The frequency of donor milk use was compared for TP and FP cases. Of 22,079 participants tested between 2016 and 2022, 96 had positive saliva results, 15 were determined to be FP, 79 TP, and 2 were excluded for incomplete clinical evaluation. Newborn donor milk use was identified for 18 (19.14%) of all the positive saliva screens. Among the 15 FPs, 11 (73.33%) consumed donor milk compared to 7 of the 79 TPs (8.8%) (OR 28.29, 95% CI 7.10-112.73, p < 0.001). While milk bank Holder pasteurization inactivates CMV infectivity, CMV DNA may still be detectable. Due to this possible association, screening programs that undertake testing saliva for CMV DNA may benefit from documenting donor milk use as a potential increased risk for FP results.

Background: Persons living with HIV (PLHIV) who are also infected with Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) constitute a group among the highest risk for Kaposi sarcoma (KS). As such, understanding KSHV prevalence amongst PLHIV is important for the control of KS. To date, data on KSHV prevalence amongst PLHIV in East Africa - one of the world's hotbeds for KS - is both sparse and variable. Method(s): In a cross-sectional design, we studied consecutive adult PLHIV identified just prior to starting antiretroviral therapy at an ambulatory HIV clinic in Mbarara, Uganda. Results from two enzyme immunoassays (with synthetic K8.1 and ORF 65 antigens as targets) and one immunofluorescence assay (using induced BCBL cells) to detect antibodies to KSHV were combined to classify KSHV antibody positivity. Result(s): We evaluated 727 PLHIV between 2005 to 2013; median age was 34 years (interquartile range (IQR): 28-40), 69% were women, and median CD4 count was 167 cells/microl (IQR: 95-260). Prevalence of KSHV antibody positivity was 42% (95% CI: 38%-46%), with little substantive change after several correction approaches, including Rogan-Gladen. Adjusted prevalence of KSHV antibody positivity was 1.6 times (95% CI: 1.3-1.9) higher in men than women; adjusted absolute prevalence difference was +0.20 (95% CI: +0.11 to +0.30). Lack of formal education (prevalence ratio=1.6 comparing no school to >= 4 years of secondary school; 95% CI: 1.1-2.3) was also associated with KSHV infection. We found no strong evidence for a role for age, alcohol use, or other measurements of sexual behavior, SES, or well-being in the occurrence of KSHV antibody positivity. Conclusion(s): Among adult PLHIV in western Uganda, KSHV prevalence is estimated at 42%, with little change after several approaches to correction for antibody detection inaccuracy. This estimate differs from several others in the region (up to 83%), highlighting need for inter-assay comparison studies using identical local specimens. To the extent HIV does not influence KSHV acquisition, the findings may also represent KSHV prevalence in the general population. The large-magnitude effect of sex and education on KSHV acquisition motivates an accelerated search for mechanisms. The sex effect, in part, may explain the higher incidence of KS among men. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

Nursing home residents have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic; their age, comorbidities, and exposure to a congregate setting has placed them at high risk for both infection and severe COVID-19-associated outcomes, including death (1). Receipt of a primary COVID-19 mRNA vaccination series (2) and monovalent booster doses (3) have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality in this population. Beginning in October 2022, the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) defined up-to-date vaccination as receipt of a bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose or completion of a primary series within the preceding 2 months.* The effectiveness of being up to date with COVID-19 vaccination among nursing home residents in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection is not known. This analysis used NHSN nursing home COVID-19 data reported during November 20, 2022-January 8, 2023, to describe effectiveness of up-to-date vaccination status (versus not being up to date) against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection among nursing home residents. Adjusting for calendar week, county-level COVID-19 incidence, county-level social vulnerability index (SVI), and facility-level percentage of staff members who were up to date, up-to-date vaccine effectiveness (VE) against infection was 31.2% (95% CI = 29.1%-33.2%). Nursing home residents should stay up to date with recommended age-appropriate COVID-19 vaccination, which now includes an additional bivalent vaccine dose for moderately or severely immunocompromised adults aged ≥65 years to increase protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: To assess demographics and outcomes up to 3 years of age among children with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in California neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) during 2010-2021. METHODS: The California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC) collects data on all very low birth weight (VLBW, birth weight ≤ 1500 g) and acutely ill infants with birth weight > 1500 g across 92% of NICUs in California. VLBW infants and those with neurological conditions are referred to a statewide high-risk infant follow-up (HRIF) program. CMV infection was defined as a positive culture or PCR identified during the NICU hospitalization. RESULTS: During 2010-2021, CMV reporting rates averaged 3.5/1000 VLBW infants (n = 205) and 1.1/1000 infants >1500 g (n = 128). Among all 333 infants with CMV, 314 (94%) were discharged home alive, 271 (86%) were referred for HRIF and 205 (65%) had ≥1 visit. Whereas infants born to mothers <20 years of age had highest CMV reporting rates and those born to Hispanic mothers comprised 49% of all infected infants, they had the highest loss of follow-up. At the 12-month visit (n = 152), 19 (13%) infants with CMV had bilateral blindness and 18 (12%) had hearing loss. At the 24-month visit, 5 (5%) of 103 had severe cerebral palsy. CONCLUSIONS: Among infants admitted to the NICU, those with CMV diagnoses may over represent infants with more severe CMV disease and outcomes. The CPQCC and HRIF program findings may help inform implementation of surveillance for congenital CMV infection in other U.S. states and guide strategies to reduce disparities in access to services.

Nursing home residents have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19; older age, comorbidities, and the congregate nature of nursing homes place residents at higher risk for infection and severe COVID-19-associated outcomes, including death (1). Studies have demonstrated that receipt of a primary COVID-19 mRNA vaccination series (2) and monovalent booster doses (3) is effective in reducing COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality in this population. Public health recommendations for staying up to date with COVID-19 vaccination have been revised throughout the pandemic response, most recently to include an updated (bivalent) booster dose, which protects against both the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2 and recent Omicron variants BA.4 and BA.5 (4). However, data on the effectiveness of staying up to date, including with bivalent booster doses, are lacking among nursing home residents. CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) analyzed surveillance data to examine weekly incidence rates of COVID-19 among nursing home residents by up-to-date vaccination status (receipt of a bivalent booster dose or completion of a primary series or receipt of a monovalent booster dose within the previous 2 months [i.e., not yet eligible to receive a bivalent booster dose]).* Up-to-date vaccination status among nursing home residents remained low throughout the study period, increasing to 48.9% by the week ending January 8, 2023. During October 10, 2022-January 8, 2023, the COVID-19 weekly incidence rates (new cases per 1,000 nursing home residents) among residents who were not up to date with COVID-19 vaccination were consistently higher than those among residents who were up to date. Moreover, the weekly incidence rate ratios (IRRs) indicated that residents who were not up to date with COVID-19 vaccines had a higher risk for acquiring SARS-CoV-2 than their up-to-date counterparts (IRR range = 1.3-1.5). It is critical that nursing home residents stay up to date with COVID-19 vaccines and receive a bivalent booster dose to maximize protection against COVID-19.

The clinical presentation of varicella in unvaccinated persons, with skin vesicles and scabs, has facilitated the use of rapid diagnostic methods for confirming disease. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays are the diagnostic method of choice. The sharp decline in unmodified cases of varicella due to the US varicella vaccination program has led to fewer healthcare providers being familiar with varicella presentation and an increased reliance on laboratory diagnosis to confirm suspected cases. The mild, atypical presentation of the disease in vaccinated persons (fewer skin lesions, mostly maculopapular) has made it more challenging for providers to recognize and also to collect samples to detect the virus. Nonetheless, PCR is highly sensitive and specific in confirming modified disease if adequate samples are provided. While a positive PCR result is confirmatory, interpreting a negative result can prove to be more challenging in determining whether suspected varicella is falsely negative or attributable to other causes. Enhanced education of healthcare providers is critical for adequate specimen collection from modified varicella cases. In addition, more sensitive commercial serologic assays are needed in the United States for varicella immunity testing in the vaccine era.

This cross-sectional study assesses the prevalence of congenital cytomegalovirus infection among newborns screened in Minnesota before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Nursing home residents have experienced disproportionally high levels of COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality and were prioritized for early COVID-19 vaccination (1). Following reported declines in vaccine-induced immunity after primary series vaccination, defined as receipt of 2 primary doses of an mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) or 1 primary dose of Ad26.COV2 (Johnson & Johnson [Janssen]) vaccine (2), CDC recommended that all persons aged ≥12 years receive a COVID-19 booster vaccine dose.* Moderately to severely immunocompromised persons, a group that includes many nursing home residents, are also recommended to receive an additional primary COVID-19 vaccine dose.(†) Data on vaccine effectiveness (VE) of an additional primary or booster dose against infection with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) among nursing home residents are limited, especially against the highly transmissible B.1.1.529 and BA.2 (Omicron) variants. Weekly COVID-19 surveillance and vaccination coverage data among nursing home residents, reported by skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) to CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)(§) during February 14-March 27, 2022, when the Omicron variant accounted for >99% of sequenced isolates, were analyzed to estimate relative VE against infection for any COVID-19 additional primary or booster dose compared with primary series vaccination. After adjusting for calendar week and variability across SNFs, relative VE of a COVID-19 additional primary or booster dose was 46.9% (95% CI = 44.8%-48.9%). These findings indicate that among nursing home residents, COVID-19 additional primary or booster doses provide greater protection against Omicron variant infection than does primary series vaccination alone. All immunocompromised nursing home residents should receive an additional primary dose, and all nursing home residents should receive a booster dose, when eligible, to protect against COVID-19. Efforts to keep nursing home residents up to date with vaccination should be implemented in conjunction with other COVID-19 prevention strategies, including testing and vaccination of nursing home staff members and visitors.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) seroprevalence among US children aged 1–5 years was 28.2% during 2017–2018 in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) [1]. Here, we provide updated estimates of CMV immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroprevalence using the larger NHANES 2017–March 2020 pre-pandemic dataset.

Nursing home and long-term care facility residents live in congregate settings and are often elderly and frail, putting them at high risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and severe COVID-19-associated outcomes; therefore, this population was prioritized for early vaccination in the United States (1). Following rapid distribution and administration of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) under an Emergency Use Authorization by the Food and Drug Administration (2), observational studies among nursing home residents demonstrated vaccine effectiveness (VE) ranging from 53% to 92% against SARS-CoV-2 infection (3-6). However, concerns about the potential for waning vaccine-induced immunity and the recent emergence of the highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant(†) highlight the need to continue to monitor VE (7). Weekly data reported by the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare (CMS)-certified skilled nursing facilities or nursing homes to CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)(§) were analyzed to evaluate effectiveness of full vaccination (2 doses received ≥14 days earlier) with any of the two currently authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines during the period soon after vaccine introduction and before the Delta variant was circulating (pre-Delta [March 1-May 9, 2021]), and when the Delta variant predominated(¶) (Delta [June 21-August 1, 2021]). Using 17,407 weekly reports from 3,862 facilities from the pre-Delta period, adjusted effectiveness against infection for any mRNA vaccine was 74.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 70.0%-78.8%). Analysis using 33,160 weekly reports from 11,581 facilities during an intermediate period (May 10-June 20) found that the adjusted effectiveness was 67.5% (95% CI = 60.1%-73.5%). Analysis using 85,593 weekly reports from 14,917 facilities during the Delta period found that the adjusted effectiveness was 53.1% (95% CI = 49.1%-56.7%). Effectiveness estimates were similar for Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines. These findings indicate that mRNA vaccines provide protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection among nursing home residents; however, VE was lower after the Delta variant became the predominant circulating strain in the United States. This analysis assessed VE against any infection, without being able to distinguish between asymptomatic and symptomatic presentations. Additional evaluations are needed to understand protection against severe disease in nursing home residents over time. Because nursing home residents might remain at some risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection despite vaccination, multiple COVID-19 prevention strategies, including infection control, testing, and vaccination of nursing home staff members, residents, and visitors, are critical. An additional dose of COVID-19 vaccine might be considered for nursing home and long-term care facility residents to optimize a protective immune response.

Urine is the best specimen for the diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus, but collection and processing of liquid urine are impractical for screening. Urine dried on filter paper was processed by the same convenient, low-cost method used by newborn screening to test blood spots and showed high sensitivity and specificity. To explore low cost, high-throughput methods to diagnose congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV), we processed CMV-positive urine dried on filter paper by the same method used for processing blood spots for newborn screening. The results showed high sensitivity and specificity.

IMPORTANCE: Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the leading infectious cause of birth defects in the United States, affecting approximately 1 out of 200 newborns. Increasing awareness of congenital CMV infection among policy makers and the public is critical for advancing the evidence base for prevention and intervention strategies, including behavioral interventions for pregnant women, newborn screening to enable timely interventions, and garnering support for vaccine development. OBJECTIVE: To understand the current landscape of CMV-related statutes and regulations, we conducted a 50-state legal epidemiology study of laws expressly referencing "cytomegalovirus." EVIDENCE REVIEW: Our search yielded 101 statutes and regulations from 35 jurisdictions (34 states and District of Columbia). We systematically reviewed and coded the texts for themes. FINDINGS: Laws addressed 3 main themes: (1) CMV awareness and education; (2) testing and reporting; and (3) the provision of services. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: State-level CMV laws have been enacted to increase CMV awareness and to implement CMV testing for infants at a higher risk for infection, such as those who do not pass newborn hearing screening. This study provides a complete legal assessment of existing ways law is used to address CMV infection in the United States.

A multiplex real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) assay for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was developed based on the same primer and probe sequences of an existing U.S. CDC Emergency Use authorized test panel, targeting SARS-CoV-2 N1, N2 and human RNase P genes in singleplex. Both singleplex and multiplex assays demonstrated linear dynamic ranges of 8 orders of magnitude and analytical limits of detection of 5 RNA transcript copies/reaction. Both assays showed 100% agreement with 364 previously characterized clinical specimens (146 positive and 218 negative) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. To further increase testing throughput, 40 positive and 20 negative four-specimen pools were tested by the multiplex assay and showed 97.75% and 100% congruence with individual specimen tests, respectively. rRT-PCR assay multiplexing and sample pooling, individually or in combination, can substantially increase throughput of SARS-CoV-2 testing.

OBJECTIVE: This is a critical review of published economic analyses on congenital cytomegalovirus infection and strategies for its detection and prevention. FINDINGS: The review identified four cost-of-illness studies and nine cost-effectiveness analyses: three of vaccination of young women, two of prenatal screening, and four of newborn screening. All reported either large economic costs or favorable cost-effectiveness of interventions. However, sensitivity analyses did not address some of the most critical assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Reviewed economic analyses overattributed certain adverse long-term outcomes to congenital cytomegalovirus infection, while other long-term costs were not included. Overall, limited conceptual frameworks, unrepresentative data sources, and unsupported or inadequately documented assumptions regarding outcomes and costs hinder the ability of policymakers to draw conclusions. A major challenge is the limited information on long-term outcomes and costs for representative cohorts of individuals with congenital cytomegalovirus, which further research could helpfully address.

IMPORTANCE: The sensitivity of dried blood spots (DBS) to identify newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection has not been evaluated in screening studies using the current, higher-sensitivity methods for DBS processing. OBJECTIVE: To assess the sensitivity of DBS polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for newborn screening for cCMV infection using saliva as the reference standard for screening, followed by collection of a urine sample for confirmation of congenital infection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study took place at 5 newborn nurseries and 3 neonatal intensive care units in the Minneapolis/Saint Paul area in Minnesota from April 2016 to June 2019. Newborns enrolled with parental consent were screened for cCMV using DBS obtained for routine newborn screening and saliva collected 1 to 2 days after birth. Dried blood spots were tested for CMV DNA by PCR at both the University of Minnesota (UMN) and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Saliva swabs were tested by CMV DNA PCR at the UMN laboratory only. Newborns who screened positive by saliva or DBS had a diagnostic urine sample obtained by primary care professionals, tested by PCR within 3 weeks of birth. Analysis began July 2019. EXPOSURES: Detection of CMV from a saliva swab using a PCR assay. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Number of children with urine-confirmed cCMV and the proportion of them who were CMV positive through DBS screening. RESULTS: Of 1 554 individuals enrolled through June 2019 (of 25 000 projected enrollment), 56 newborns were confirmed to have cCMV (4.5 per 1000 [95% CI, 3.3-5.7]). Combined DBS results from either UMN or CDC had a sensitivity of 85.7% (48 of 56; 95% CI, 74.3%-92.6%), specificity of 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0%-100.0%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 98.0% (95% CI, 89.3%-99.6%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.9%-100.0%). Dried blood spot results from UMN had a sensitivity of 73.2% (95% CI, 60.4%-83.0%), specificity of 100.0% (100.0%-100.0%), PPV of 100.0% (95% CI, 91.4%-100.0%), and NPV of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.8%-99.9%). Dried blood spot results from CDC had a sensitivity of 76.8% (95% CI, 64.2%-85.9%), specificity of 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0%-100.0%), PPV of 97.7% (95% CI, 88.2%-99.6%), and NPV of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.8%-99.9%). Saliva swab results had a sensitivity of 92.9% (52 of 56; 95% CI, 83.0%-97.2%), specificity of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.9%-100.0%), PPV of 86.7% (95% CI, 75.8%-93.1%), and NPV of 100.0% (95% CI, 99.9%-100.0%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates relatively high analytical sensitivity for DBS compared with previous studies that performed population-based screening. As more sensitive DNA extraction and PCR methods continue to emerge, DBS-based testing should remain under investigation as a potential low-cost, high-throughput option for cCMV screening.

We assessed maternal and infant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in Colombia. Maternal serum was tested for CMV immunoglobulin G antibodies at a median of 10 (interquartile range: 8-12) weeks gestation (n=1,501). CMV DNA polymerase chain reaction was performed on infant urine to diagnose congenital (≤21 days of life) and postnatal (>21 days) infection. Maternal CMV seroprevalence was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 97.5-98.8%). Congenital CMV prevalence was 8.4 (95% CI: 3.9-18.3; 6/711) per 1,000 live births. Among 472 infants without confirmed congenital CMV infection subsequently tested at age 6 months, 258 (54.7%, 95% CI: 50.2%-59.1%) had postnatal infection. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Dear Editor, Petersen et al reported that cytomegalovirus (CMV) seroprevalence among U.S. children aged 1–5 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) increased from 20.7% in 2011–2012 to 28.2% in 2017–2018, with significant increases among 1-year-olds, non-Hispanic White children, those living at or above the poverty level, and being the only child ≤5 years in the household [1]. As we previously reported, 2011–2012 NHANES results indicated that these groups had significantly lower CMV seroprevalence in comparison to children that were older, Hispanic, living below the poverty level, and living with another child ≤5 years in the household, respectively [2, 3].

After following 141 children with likely asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a highly immune population in China, four children (2.8%) were found to have late-onset hearing loss. No maternal or childhood factors, except higher saliva cytomegalovirus viral load at birth (P = 0.03), were associated with increased risk of developing a hearing loss.

In January 2020, with support from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), CDC instituted an enhanced entry risk assessment and management (screening) program for air passengers arriving from certain countries with widespread, sustained transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The objectives of the screening program were to reduce the importation of COVID-19 cases into the United States and slow subsequent spread within states. Screening aimed to identify travelers with COVID-19-like illness or who had a known exposure to a person with COVID-19 and separate them from others. Screening also aimed to inform all screened travelers about self-monitoring and other recommendations to prevent disease spread and obtain their contact information to share with public health authorities in destination states. CDC delegated postarrival management of crew members to airline occupational health programs by issuing joint guidance with the Federal Aviation Administration.* During January 17-September 13, 2020, a total of 766,044 travelers were screened, 298 (0.04%) of whom met criteria for public health assessment; 35 (0.005%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2, and nine (0.001%) had a positive test result. CDC shared contact information with states for approximately 68% of screened travelers because of data collection challenges and some states' opting out of receiving data. The low case detection rate of this resource-intensive program highlighted the need for fundamental change in the U.S. border health strategy. Because SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission can occur in the absence of symptoms and because the symptoms of COVID-19 are nonspecific, symptom-based screening programs are ineffective for case detection. Since the screening program ended on September 14, 2020, efforts to reduce COVID-19 importation have focused on enhancing communications with travelers to promote recommended preventive measures, reinforcing mechanisms to refer overtly ill travelers to CDC, and enhancing public health response capacity at ports of entry. More efficient collection of contact information for international air passengers before arrival and real-time transfer of data to U.S. health departments would facilitate timely postarrival public health management, including contact tracing, when indicated. Incorporating health attestations, predeparture and postarrival testing, and a period of limited movement after higher-risk travel, might reduce risk for transmission during travel and translocation of SARS-CoV-2 between geographic areas and help guide more individualized postarrival recommendations.

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) following kidney transplantation can result from recipient reactivation of latent human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection or activation of donor acquired HHV-8 infection. Post-transplant KS typically manifests with cutaneous pathology, but rare cases of renal allograft involvement have been reported. We describe two cases of donor derived HHV-8 infection in two hepatitis C (HCV) viremia negative transplant recipients who each received a kidney from a donor with HCV viremia. One recipient did not develop KS while the other presented with acute kidney injury due to extensive KS infiltration of the renal parenchyma and metastatic disease. This report reviews the literature for cases of KS involving the renal allograft and highlights an unexpected consequence of deliberate HCV positive organ transplantation.

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) can develop following organ transplantation through reactivation of recipient human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection or through donor-derived HHV-8 transmission. We describe six cases of donor-derived HHV-8 infection and KS investigated July 2018 - January 2020. Organs from six donors, retrospectively identified as HHV-8-positive, with a history of drug use disorder, were transplanted into 22 recipients. Four of six donors had risk factors for HHV-8 infection reported in donor history questionnaires. Fourteen of twenty-two organ recipients (64%) had evidence of post-transplant HHV-8 infection. Lung recipients were particularly susceptible to KS. Four of the six recipients who developed KS died from KS or associated complications. The U.S. opioid crisis has resulted in an increasing number and proportion of organ donors with substance use disorder, and particularly injection drug use history, which may increase risk of HHV-8 transmission to recipients. Better awareness of the risk of post-transplant KS for recipients of organs from donors with HHV-8 infection risk could be useful for recipient management. Testing donors and recipients for HHV-8 is currently challenging with no validated commercial serology kits available. Limited HHV-8 antibody testing is available through some U.S. reference laboratories and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Recent studies in Africa have shown an increased prevalence of congenital CMV infection among HIV-exposed infants compared with HIV-unexposed infants, despite near universal maternal use of highly active antiretroviral therapy. [1,2] However, data on the burden of congenital CMV-related sequelae among HIV-exposed and -unexposed children in Africa are limited. In this letter, we report updated estimates of prevalence by HIV-exposure status and clinical outcomes of CMV-positive children identified by screening 1078 newborns in western Kenya during 2015–2017. [1]

BACKGROUND: Data on congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in Africa are limited. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of congenital CMV infection in a population with high prevalence of maternal HIV and malaria infection in western Kenya. STUDY DESIGN: We screened newborns for CMV by polymerase chain reaction assay of saliva swabs and dried blood spots (DBS), and assessed maternal CMV immunoglobulin G (IgG) status by testing serum eluted from newborn's DBS. We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) using log-binomial regression models. RESULTS: Among 1066 mothers, 210 (19.7%) had HIV infection and 207 (19.4%) had malaria infection; 33 (3.1%) mothers had both. Maternal CMV IgG prevalence was 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.3%-96.0%). Among 1078 newborns (12 sets of twins), 39 (3.6%, 95% CI: 2.7-4.9%) were CMV positive. The prevalence of congenital CMV infection by maternal HIV and malaria infection status was 5.0% (95% CI: 2.7-9.2%) for HIV only, 5.1% (95% CI: 2.7-9.4%) for malaria only, 8.8 (95% CI: 3.1-23.0) for HIV and malaria co-infection, and 2.6% (95% CI: 1.7-4.1%) for none. Congenital CMV infection was independently associated with maternal HIV infection (aPR=2.1; 95% CI: 1.0-4.2), adjusting for maternal age, parity, and malaria infection. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of congenital CMV infection was higher than the 0.2-0.7% in developed countries. Maternal HIV infection may increase the risk of congenital CMV infection, but the role of maternal malaria on intrauterine transmission of CMV remains unclear.

BACKGROUND: Dried blood spots (DBS), collected universally from newborns in the U.S., could be used as a matrix for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in infants. However, sensitivity to detect CMV in DBS as compared to saliva and urine is variable across studies largely due to the DNA extraction method. Thermal shock, a widely used DNA extraction method, is highly sensitive for the detection of CMV in DBS, however, the processing time required is not practical for high-throughput testing. OBJECTIVE: To determine if rapid and cost-effective DNA extraction methods amenable to newborn screening (NBS) could achieve the same sensitivity as the thermal shock method. STUDY DESIGN: DBS were prepared from CMV positive blood samples from 20 organ transplant recipients. Three DNA extraction methods were compared for relative yield and sensitivity of detection of CMV DNA: thermal shock, KOH Tris buffer, and DNA Extract All. CMV DNA was detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). RESULTS: The KOH Tris and DNA Extract All methods gave higher yields and sensitivity of CMV detection in DBS than thermal shock, which were significantly greater when viral loads were </= 10,000 copies/ml blood. Both methods gave faster turnaround times than thermal shock and would be better suited for NBS. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of DNA extraction method greatly influences the ability to detect low levels of CMV DNA in DBS. Moreover, development of highly sensitive yet rapid methods for CMV detection could help facilitate future newborn screening of CMV in DBS.

Among newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection from China, there was no difference in CMV viral load in saliva specimens dried and stored at room temperature compared with those kept wet and stored cold, even after longer storage time for the former than the later (74 vs 58 days, P = .02).

BACKGROUND: Caring for young children is a known risk factor for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection mainly through exposure to their saliva and urine. In a previous study, 36 CMV-seropositive children 2 mo. to 4 years old were categorized as CMV shedders (n = 23) or non-shedders (n = 13) based on detection of CMV DNA in their saliva and urine. The current study evaluated the presence of CMV on surfaces in homes of the children. METHODS: Study staff made 4 visits to homes of the 36 enrolled children over 100 days. Saliva was collected by swabbing the mouth and urine was collected on filter paper inserted into diapers. In addition, five surface specimens were collected: three in contact with children's saliva (spoon, child's cheek, washcloth) and two in contact with children's urine (diaper changing table, mother's hand). Samples were tested by PCR and viral culture to quantify the presence of CMV DNA and viable virus. RESULTS: A total of 654 surface samples from 36 homes were tested; 136 were CMV DNA positive, 122 of which (90%) were in homes of the children shedding CMV (p < 0.001). Saliva-associated samples were more often CMV positive with higher viral loads than urine-associated samples. The higher the CMV viral load of the child in the home, the more home surfaces that were PCR positive (p = 0.01) and viral culture positive (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The main source for CMV on surfaces in homes was saliva from the child in the home. Higher CMV viral loads shed by children correlated with more viable virus on surfaces which could potentially contribute to viral transmission.

Background: There are no data on the prevalence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) shedding from a representative sample of the US population. This information is critical for understanding and preventing CMV. Methods: We tested urine specimens from CMV IgG-positive participants aged 6-49 years in three racial/ethnic groups from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 1999-2004 for the presence of CMV DNA with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. We examined the association of sociodemographic characteristics with shedding prevalence and viral loads. Results: Among 6,828 CMV IgG-positive subjects tested, 537 had CMV DNA detected in urine-a shedding prevalence of 9.70%. Among persons 6-49 years, shedding prevalence was 3.83%. The prevalence of urinary shedding was inversely associated with increasing age (26.60%, 6.50%, and 3.45% in CMV IgG-positive subjects aged 6-11, 12-19, and 20-49 years, respectively; P 0.001 for trend test and pairwise comparisons). Urinary viral load also decreased significantly with age (mean: 2.97, 2.69, and 2.43 log10 copies/mL in those age groups, respectively; P 0.001 for trend test and pairwise comparisons). Conclusions: Urinary CMV shedding and viral loads decreased dramatically by age, likely reflecting higher rates of primary CMV infection and longer duration of shedding in younger individuals. The findings demonstrate that children 6-11 years of age continue to shed CMV at higher rates and viral loads than adolescents and adults and thus may still be an important source for CMV transmission.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical characteristics and trends in valganciclovir use among infants diagnosed with congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed data from medical claims dated 2009-2015 from the Truven Health MarketScan((R)) Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicaid databases. We identified infants with a live birth code in the first claim who were continuously enrolled for at least 45 days. Among infants diagnosed with congenital CMV disease, identified by an ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM code for congenital CMV infection or CMV disease within 45 days of birth, we assessed data from claims containing codes for any CMV-associated clinical condition within the same period, and data from claims for hearing loss and/or valganciclovir within the first 180 days of life. FINDINGS: In the commercial and Medicaid databases, we identified 257 (2.5/10,000) and 445 (3.3/10,000) infants, respectively, diagnosed with congenital CMV disease, among whom 135 (53%) and 282 (63%) had >/=1 CMV-associated condition, 30 (12%) and 32 (7%) had hearing loss, and 41 (16%) and 78 (18%) had a claim for valganciclovir. Among infants with congenital CMV disease who had a claim for valganciclovir, 37 (90%) among commercially insured infants and 68 (87%) among Medicaid-insured infants had >/=1 CMV-associated condition and/or hearing loss. From 2009 to 2015, the percentages with a claim for valganciclovir increased from 0% to 29% among commercially insured infants and from 4% to 37% among Medicaid-insured infants (P < 0.0001). IMPLICATIONS: During 2009-2015, there was a strong upward trend in valganciclovir claims among insured infants who were diagnosed with congenital CMV disease, the majority of whom had CMV-associated conditions and/or hearing loss.