IMPORTANCE: The protocol of a randomized trial is the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and external review. However, trial protocols vary in their completeness and often do not address key elements of design and conduct. The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement was first published in 2013 as guidance to improve the completeness of trial protocols. Periodic updates incorporating the latest evidence and best practices are needed to ensure that the guidance remains relevant to users. Herein, we systematically update the SPIRIT recommendations for minimum items to address in the protocol of a randomized trial. OBSERVATIONS: We completed a scoping review and developed a project specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence to generate a list of potential changes to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by lead authors of existing SPIRIT/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extensions (harms, outcomes, nonpharmacological treatment) and other reporting guidelines (Template for Intervention Description and Replication [TIDieR]). The potential modifications were rated in a 3-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting. Overall, 317 individuals participated in the Delphi consensus process and 30 experts attended the consensus meeting. The process led to the addition of 2 new protocol items, revision to 5 items, deletion/merger of 5 items, and integration of key items from other relevant reporting guidelines. Notable changes include a new open-science section, additional emphasis on the assessment of harms and description of interventions and comparators, and a new item on how patients and the public will be involved in trial design, conduct, and reporting. The updated SPIRIT 2025 statement consists of an evidence based checklist of 34 minimum items to address in a trial protocol, along with a diagram illustrating the schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments for trial participants. To facilitate implementation, we also developed an expanded version of the SPIRIT 2025 checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Widespread endorsement and adherence to the updated SPIRIT 2025 statement have the potential to enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries, policy makers, regulators, and other reviewers.

The Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) is a reporting guideline developed to provide reporting recommendations for studies evaluating the performance of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-driven chatbots when summarizing clinical evidence and providing health advice, referred to as Chatbot Health Advice (CHA) studies. CHART was developed in several phases after performing a comprehensive systematic review to identify variation in the conduct, reporting and methodology in CHA studies. Findings from the review were used to develop a draft checklist that was revised through an international, multidisciplinary modified asynchronous Delphi consensus process of 531 stakeholders, three synchronous panel consensus meetings of 48 stakeholders, and subsequent pilot testing of the checklist. CHART includes 12 items and 39 subitems to promote transparent and comprehensive reporting of CHA studies. These include Title (subitem 1a), Abstract/Summary (subitem 1b), Background (subitems 2ab), Model Identifiers (subitem 3ab), Model Details (subitems 4abc), Prompt Engineering (subitems 5ab), Query Strategy (subitems 6abcd), Performance Evaluation (subitems 7ab), Sample Size (subitem 8), Data Analysis (subitem 9a), Results (subitems 10abc), Discussion (subitems 11abc), Disclosures (subitem 12a), Funding (subitem 12b), Ethics (subitem 12c), Protocol (subitem 12d), and Data Availability (subitem 12e). The CHART checklist and corresponding methodological diagram were designed to support key stakeholders including clinicians, researchers, editors, peer reviewers, and readers in reporting, understanding, and interpreting the findings of CHA studies.

IMPORTANCE: The rise in chatbot health advice (CHA) studies is accompanied by heterogeneity in reporting standards, impacting their interpretability. OBJECTIVE: To provide reporting recommendations for studies evaluating the performance of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-driven chatbots when summarizing clinical evidence and providing health advice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: CHART was developed in several phases after performing a comprehensive systematic review to identify variation in the conduct, reporting, and methodology in CHA studies. Findings from the review were used to develop a draft checklist that was revised through an international, multidisciplinary modified asynchronous Delphi consensus process of 531 stakeholders, 3 synchronous panel consensus meetings of 48 stakeholders, and subsequent pilot testing of the checklist. RESULTS: CHART includes 12 items and 39 subitems to promote transparent and comprehensive reporting of CHA studies. These include title (subitem 1a), abstract or summary (subitem 1b), background (subitems 2ab), model identifiers (subitem 3ab), model details (subitems 4abc), prompt engineering (subitems 5ab), query strategy (subitems 6abcd), performance evaluation (subitems 7ab), sample size (subitem 8), data analysis (subitem 9a), results (subitems 10abc), discussion (subitems 11abc), disclosures (subitem 12a), funding (subitem 12b), ethics (subitem 12c), protocol (subitem 12d), and data availability (subitem 12e). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The CHART checklist and corresponding methodological diagram were designed to support key stakeholders including clinicians, researchers, editors, peer reviewers, and readers in reporting, understanding, and interpreting the findings of CHA studies.

BACKGROUND: The Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) is a reporting guideline developed to provide reporting recommendations for studies evaluating the performance of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-driven chatbots when summarizing clinical evidence and providing health advice, referred to as Chatbot Health Advice (CHA) studies. METHODS: CHART was developed in several phases after performing a comprehensive systematic review to identify variation in the conduct, reporting, and methodology in CHA studies. Findings from the review were used to develop a draft checklist that was revised through an international, multidisciplinary modified asynchronous Delphi consensus process of 531 stakeholders, three synchronous panel consensus meetings of 48 stakeholders, and subsequent pilot testing of the checklist. RESULTS: CHART includes 12 items and 39 subitems to promote transparent and comprehensive reporting of CHA studies. These include Title (subitem 1a), Abstract/Summary (subitem 1b), Background (subitems 2ab), Model Identifiers (subitems 3ab), Model Details (subitems 4abc), Prompt Engineering (subitems 5ab), Query Strategy (subitems 6abcd), Performance Evaluation (subitems 7ab), Sample Size (subitem 8), Data Analysis (subitem 9a), Results (subitems 10abc), Discussion (subitems 11abc), Disclosures (subitem 12a), Funding (subitem 12b), Ethics (subitem 12c), Protocol (subitem 12d), and Data Availability (subitem 12e). CONCLUSION: The CHART checklist and corresponding methodological diagram were designed to support key stakeholders including clinicians, researchers, editors, peer reviewers, and readers in reporting, understanding, and interpreting the findings of CHA studies.

In November 2024, a case of clade Ib mpox was confirmed in Canada. Here, we describe the events that led to laboratory confirmation of clade Ib monkeypox virus (MPXV) and the public health response. Genomic analysis of the Canadian clade Ib MPXV revealed a number of APOBEC3-related mutations suggesting sustained human-to-human transmission. These findings expand the number of countries with travel-related clade Ib mpox and highlights the continued need for mpox monitoring of potential human adaptations or new transmission patterns.

To date, the primary focus of chronic kidney disease (CKD) care has been on managing disease progression, complications, and kidney failure. In contrast, maintaining kidney health and preventing CKD have received limited attention, despite their potential to save millions of lives, reduce health care costs, and lessen environmental burdens. The cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) concept frames CKD as part of a complex, high-risk syndrome requiring global risk assessment and multifactorial intervention. CKD incidence along with CKM risk factors may be reduced by a healthy diet, physical activity, and a supportive environment. However, risk for CKD does extend beyond the cardiovascular-metabolic component, and residual risk persists despite healthy lifestyles and treatment of risk factors. Post hoc analyses of clinical trials suggest pharmacological interventions, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, may help to prevent or regress CKD in individuals with type 2 diabetes or obesity. Clinical trials are needed to validate these findings in broader high-risk populations. Personalized strategies to improve kidney health should include CKD risk prediction via targeted testing, genetic or biomarker assessments, shared decision-making, cost considerations, selection of therapeutics, and the potential for adverse effects. The overall goals of CKD prevention should prioritize a lifespan approach to risk evaluation along with safe, efficacious, and accessible interventions to maintain kidney health.

OBJECTIVES: Interfacility patient transfers contribute to the regional spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). We evaluated whether transfer patterns of inpatients with similar characteristics to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) case-patients (CRE surrogates) better reflect hospital-level CRE burden than traditionally used populations. DESIGN: We determined the risk factors for subsequent hospital admission using demographic and clinical information from Tennessee Department of Health tracked CRE case-patients from July 2015 to September 2019. Risk factors were used to identify CRE surrogates among inpatients in the 2018 Tennessee Hospital Discharge Data System (HDDS). Transfer networks of CRE surrogates, Medicare/TennCare beneficiaries, and all-inpatients with ≤365 days of intervening community stays were compared with the transfer networks of CRE case-patients in 2019. The associations between hospital-level CRE prevalence and hospitals' incoming transfer volumes from each network were assessed using negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: Eight risk factors for subsequent hospital admission were identified from 2,518 CRE case-patients, which were used to match CRE case-patients with HDDS inpatients, resulting in 10,069 surrogate patients. CRE surrogate network showed more structural similarities with the CRE case-patient network than with the all-inpatient and Medicare/TennCare networks. A 33% increase in hospitals' CRE prevalence in 2019 was associated with each doubling of incoming transfer of CRE surrogates in 2018 (adjusted Risk Ratio [aRR] 1.33, 95%CI: 1.1, 1.59), higher than all-inpatient (aRR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.51) and Medicare/TennCare networks (aRR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.44). CONCLUSIONS: Surrogate transfer patterns were associated with hospital-level CRE prevalence, highlighting their value in MDRO containment and prevention.

During an outbreak investigation of infections following apheresis platelet transfusion, a potentially novel species in the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex was identified. Here, we report the hybrid Nanopore-Illumina assembly resulting in a complete circular genome sequence of a strain of this species isolated from apheresis platelet product collected during the investigation.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury is a major cause of death and disability worldwide, with almost half of new cases occurring in children, adolescents, and young adults. However, data on injury characteristics stratified by social determinants of health are scarce. This study explores severity, intent, and mechanism of traumatic brain injury sustained during childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood by social determinants of health. METHODS: This study utilizes a population-based birth cohort of births in publicly funded hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between April 1, 1992 and March 31, 2020 (n = 3,648,760). Individuals experiencing a traumatic brain injury requiring medical attention to the emergency department or acute care between April 1, 2002 and November 20, 2020 (n = 94,514) were identified using International Classification of Diseases Version 10 diagnosis codes. Social determinants of health variables included age, sex, rurality of residence, neighbourhood income quintile, and the following Ontario Marginalization Index variables: households and dwellings, material resources, and racialized and newcomer populations. The primary outcome was percentage of injuries falling under each mechanism, intent, and severity of injury category, stratified by social determinants of health variables. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of injuries were mild and 96.2% of injuries were unintentional. Injury severity and intent of injury significantly varied by social determinants of health; for example, the proportion of traumatic brain injury-related healthcare visits for moderate/severe and intentional injuries was highest in areas with the lowest income quintile (13.3% and 6.1%, respectively), lowest households and dwellings stability (12.2% and 5.7%, respectively), lowest material resources (12.8% and 6.0% respectively), and highest racialized and newcomer populations (13.5% and 4.5% respectively). The percentage of traumatic brain injury-related healthcare visits for a sports-related injury significantly varied by social determinants of health; for example, the proportion of traumatic brain injury-related healthcare visits for sports-related injuries was highest among males (45.5%), those living rural areas (44.0%), and those living in areas with the highest income (47.2%), highest households and dwellings stability (44.0%), highest material resources (45.8%), and lowest racialized and newcomer populations (43.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of traumatic brain injury-related healthcare visits vary based on social determinants of health. Targeted prevention of traumatic brain injury beyond the sports settings, including fall prevention among young children, are encouraged, and guidelines to identify and address traumatic brain injury outside of the sports setting must be developed to support early intervention of traumatic brain injury across social determinants of health.

IMPORTANCE: The protocol of a randomised trial is the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and external review. However, trial protocols vary in their completeness and often do not address key elements of design and conduct. The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement was first published in 2013 as guidance to improve the completeness of trial protocols. Periodic updates incorporating the latest evidence and best practices are needed to ensure that the guidance remains relevant to users. OBJECTIVE: To systematically update the SPIRIT recommendations for minimum items to address in the protocol of a randomised trial. DESIGN: We completed a scoping review and developed a project specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence to generate a list of potential changes to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by lead authors of existing SPIRIT/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment) and other reporting guidelines (TIDieR). The potential modifications were rated in a three-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting. FINDINGS: Overall, 317 individuals participated in the Delphi consensus process and 30 experts attended the consensus meeting. The process led to the addition of two new protocol items, revision to five items, deletion/merger of five items, and integration of key items from other relevant reporting guidelines. Notable changes include a new open science section, additional emphasis on the assessment of harms and description of interventions and comparators, and a new item on how patients and the public will be involved in trial design, conduct, and reporting. The updated SPIRIT 2025 statement consists of an evidence-based checklist of 34 minimum items to address in a trial protocol, along with a diagram illustrating the schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments for trial participants. To facilitate implementation, we also developed an expanded version of the SPIRIT 2025 checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Widespread endorsement and adherence to the updated SPIRIT 2025 statement have the potential to enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators, and other reviewers.

BACKGROUND: Well designed and properly executed randomised trials are considered the most reliable evidence on the benefits of healthcare interventions. However, there is overwhelming evidence that the quality of reporting is not optimal. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement was designed to improve the quality of reporting and provides a minimum set of items to be included in a report of a randomised trial. CONSORT was first published in 1996, then updated in 2001 and 2010. Here, we present the updated CONSORT 2025 statement, which aims to account for recent methodological advancements and feedback from end users. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of the literature and developed a project-specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence related to CONSORT, to generate a list of potential changes to the checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by the lead authors of existing CONSORT extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment), other related reporting guidelines (TIDieR) and recommendations from other sources (e.g., personal communications). The list of potential changes to the checklist was assessed in a large, international, online, three-round Delphi survey involving 317 participants and discussed at a two-day online expert consensus meeting of 30 invited international experts. RESULTS: We have made substantive changes to the CONSORT checklist. We added seven new checklist items, revised three items, deleted one item, and integrated several items from key CONSORT extensions. We also restructured the CONSORT checklist, with a new section on open science. The CONSORT 2025 statement consists of a 30-item checklist of essential items that should be included when reporting the results of a randomised trial and a diagram for documenting the flow of participants through the trial. To facilitate implementation of CONSORT 2025, we have also developed an expanded version of the CONSORT 2025 checklist, with bullet points eliciting critical elements of each item. CONCLUSIONS: Authors, editors, reviewers, and other potential users should use CONSORT 2025 when writing and evaluating manuscripts of randomised trials to ensure that trial reports are clear and transparent.

The protocol of a randomized trial is the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting and external review. However, trial protocols vary in their completeness and often do not address key elements of design and conduct. The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement was first published in 2013 as guidance to improve the completeness of trial protocols. Periodic updates incorporating the latest evidence and best practices are needed to ensure that the guidance remains relevant to users. Here, we aimed to systematically update the SPIRIT recommendations for minimum items to address in the protocol of a randomized trial. We completed a scoping review and developed a project-specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence to generate a list of potential changes to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by lead authors of existing SPIRIT/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment) and other reporting guidelines (TIDieR). The potential modifications were rated in a three-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting. Overall, 317 individuals participated in the Delphi consensus process and 30 experts attended the consensus meeting. The process led to the addition of two new protocol items, revision to five items, deletion/merger of five items, and integration of key items from other relevant reporting guidelines. Notable changes include a new open science section, additional emphasis on the assessment of harms and description of interventions and comparators, and a new item on how patients and the public will be involved in trial design, conduct and reporting. The updated SPIRIT 2025 statement consists of an evidence-based checklist of 34 minimum items to address in a trial protocol, along with a diagram illustrating the schedule of enrollment, interventions and assessments for trial participants. To facilitate implementation, we also developed an expanded version of the SPIRIT 2025 checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document. Widespread endorsement and adherence to the updated SPIRIT 2025 statement have the potential to enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators and other reviewers.

IMPORTANCE: The protocol of a randomised trial is the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and external review. However, trial protocols vary in their completeness and often do not address key elements of design and conduct. The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement was first published in 2013 as guidance to improve the completeness of trial protocols. Periodic updates incorporating the latest evidence and best practices are needed to ensure that the guidance remains relevant to users. OBJECTIVE: To systematically update the SPIRIT recommendations for minimum items to address in the protocol of a randomised trial. DESIGN: We completed a scoping review and developed a project specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence to generate a list of potential changes to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by lead authors of existing SPIRIT/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment) and other reporting guidelines (TIDieR). The potential modifications were rated in a three-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting. FINDINGS: Overall, 317 individuals participated in the Delphi consensus process and 30 experts attended the consensus meeting. The process led to the addition of two new protocol items, revision to five items, deletion/merger of five items, and integration of key items from other relevant reporting guidelines. Notable changes include a new open science section, additional emphasis on the assessment of harms and description of interventions and comparators, and a new item on how patients and the public will be involved in trial design, conduct, and reporting. The updated SPIRIT 2025 statement consists of an evidence based checklist of 34 minimum items to address in a trial protocol, along with a diagram illustrating the schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments for trial participants. To facilitate implementation, we also developed an expanded version of the SPIRIT 2025 checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Widespread endorsement and adherence to the updated SPIRIT 2025 statement have the potential to enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators, and other reviewers.

Critical appraisal of the quality of randomised trials is possible only if their design, conduct, analysis, and results are completely and accurately reported. Without transparent reporting of the methods and results, readers will not be able to fully evaluate the reliability and validity of trial findings. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement aims to improve the quality of reporting and provides a minimum set of items to be included in a report of a randomised trial. CONSORT was first published in 1996 and was updated in 2001 and 2010. CONSORT comprises a checklist of essential items that should be included in reports of randomised trials and a diagram for documenting the flow of participants through a trial. The CONSORT statement has been updated (CONSORT 2025) to reflect recent methodological advancements and feedback from end users, ensuring that it remains fit for purpose. Here, we present the updated CONSORT explanation and elaboration document, which has been extensively revised and describes the rationale and scientific background for each CONSORT 2025 checklist item and provides published examples of good reporting. The objective is to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of CONSORT 2025 and provide guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of their trials and ensure trial reports are complete, and transparent.

IMPORTANCE: Well-designed and properly executed randomized trials are considered the most reliable evidence on the benefits of health care interventions. However, there is overwhelming evidence that the quality of reporting is not optimal. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement was designed to improve the quality of reporting and provides a minimum set of items to be included in a report of a randomized trial. CONSORT was first published in 1996, then updated in 2001 and 2010. Herein, we present the updated CONSORT 2025 statement, which aims to account for recent methodological advancements and feedback from end users. OBSERVATIONS: We conducted a scoping review of the literature and developed a project-specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence related to CONSORT to generate a list of potential changes to the checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by the lead authors of existing CONSORT extensions (harms, outcomes, nonpharmacological treatment), other related reporting guidelines (Template for Intervention Description and Replication [TIDieR]), and recommendations from other sources (eg, personal communications). The list of potential changes to the checklist was assessed in a large, international, online, 3-round Delphi survey involving 317 participants and discussed at a 2-day online expert consensus meeting of 30 invited international experts. We have made substantive changes to the CONSORT checklist. We added 7 new checklist items, revised 3 items, deleted 1 item, and integrated several items from key CONSORT extensions. We also restructured the CONSORT checklist, with a new section on open science. The CONSORT 2025 statement consists of a 30-item checklist of essential items that should be included when reporting the results of a randomized trial and a diagram for documenting the flow of participants through the trial. To facilitate implementation of CONSORT 2025, we have also developed an expanded version of the CONSORT 2025 checklist, with bullet points eliciting critical elements of each item. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Authors, editors, reviewers, and other potential users should use CONSORT 2025 when writing and evaluating manuscripts of randomized trials to ensure that trial reports are clear and transparent.

This cohort study examines incident and subsequent health care visits associated with traumatic brain injury and stratified by social determinants of health. | eng

BACKGROUND: The Zanzibar Malaria Elimination Programme relies on insecticide-treated nets as the principal vector control method, supplemented by reactive focal indoor residual spraying. Despite the success, local malaria transmission persists, and the underlying reasons for sustained transmission remain unclear, yet critical to optimizing vector control for elimination. Entomological characterization of transmission dynamics was conducted to identify the gaps with existing interventions and opportunities for complementary interventions. METHODS: Adult malaria vectors were collected monthly for two consecutive nights at ten sentinel sites (6 Unguja, 4 Pemba) from October 2022 to September 2023. Hourly indoor and outdoor human landing catch method was used for collecting mosquitoes from 18:00 to 06:00 h. RESULTS: Anopheles arabiensis was the predominant malaria vector species across all the sentinel sites, except in the urban district of Unguja, where Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto was predominant. Malaria parasite-infected An. arabiensis bites were distributed disproportionately between indoors (n = 4), 22:00 to 02:00 h, and outdoors (n = 10) earlier in the evenings, 1800 to 2100 h. CONCLUSION: The outdoor catches of malaria-parasite infected mosquitoes before typical sleeping hours highlight the potential risk of human exposure to outdoor transmission.

In 2006, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was first recommended in the United States to prevent cancers and other diseases caused by HPV; vaccination coverage increased steadily through 2021, and increasing numbers of young women had received HPV vaccine as children or adolescents. Since 2008, CDC has monitored incidence of precancerous lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] grades 2-3 and adenocarcinoma in situ [AIS], collectively CIN2+), which are detected through cervical cancer screening and can be used as an intermediate outcome for monitoring vaccination impact, via the five-site Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Impact Monitoring Project. This analysis describes trends in incidence of CIN2+ and CIN3+ (i.e., CIN grade 3 and AIS) lesions during 2008-2022. Among women aged 20-24 years who were screened for cervical cancer, rates during 2008-2022 decreased for CIN2+ by 79%, and for CIN3+ by 80%. In the same period, CIN3+ rates among screened women aged 25-29 years decreased by 37%. These data are consistent with considerable impact of HPV vaccination for preventing cervical precancers among women in the age groups most likely to have been vaccinated, and support existing recommendations to vaccinate children at the routinely recommended ages as a cancer prevention measure.

Numerous studies have investigated vaccine-induced correlates of protection (CoP) against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but data on infection-induced CoP are limited. Given differences between vaccine- and infection-induced immune responses, in conjunction with low vaccination in many US populations, a better understanding of infection-induced CoP is needed. We used residual sera from a mid-2020 Rhode Island serosurvey of healthcare professionals (HCP) and corresponding state-collected SARS-CoV-2 testing data through February 2021 to generate an analytic cohort of HCP with a first SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to serosurvey blood collection and multiple viral tests after blood collection to assess for reinfection (defined as a positive viral test ≥90 days after their first positive). We tested sera for levels of IgG and IgA targeting ancestral spike (S), receptor-binding domain (RBD), or nucleocapsid (N). We used adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios to assess the association between categorical antibody level and the risk of subsequent reinfection. Among 170 HCP included in this analysis (median age = 47 years; interquartile range: 35-55 years), 30 were reinfected during the analytic period. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios indicated that higher levels of anti-S or anti-RBD IgG were significantly associated with a lower risk of reinfection. These findings support the use of anti-S or anti-RBD IgG levels as markers of immunologic protection, such as in population serosurveys, or immune-bridging studies in settings of high prevalence of prior infection.  IMPORTANCEThe measurement of antibodies in blood is a relatively simple process and commonly used to estimate overall levels of past infection in populations. But, if someone has antibodies, does this mean that they are protected from being infected again? And are people with higher levels of antibody better protected? There are good data in the literature exploring how antibodies from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination are associated with protection. But, there is still a lot to learn about protection conferred by antibodies that develop after a severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In our study, we measure the levels of six different antibody types developed after infection and compare levels to the risk of subsequent infection to better understand which antibody types are best associated with protection. Our data are important for improving studies that use antibodies as proxies for protection, such as population immunity estimates, or those assessing new prevention products.

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) introduced in childhood national immunization programs lowered vaccine-type invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), but replacement with non-vaccine-types persisted throughout the PCV10/13 follow-up period. We assessed PCV10/13 impact on pneumococcal meningitis incidence globally. METHODS: The number of cases with serotyped pneumococci detected in cerebrospinal fluid and population denominators were obtained from surveillance sites globally. Site-specific meningitis incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing pre-PCV incidence to each year post-PCV10/13 were estimated by age (<5, 5-17 and ≥18 years) using Bayesian multi-level mixed effects Poisson regression, accounting for pre-PCV trends. All-site weighted average IRRs were estimated using linear mixed-effects regression stratified by age, product (PCV10 or PCV13) and prior PCV7 impact (none, moderate, or substantial). Changes in pneumococcal meningitis incidence were estimated overall and for product-specific vaccine-types and non-PCV13-types. RESULTS: Analyses included 10,168 cases <5 y from PCV13 sites and 2849 from PCV10 sites, 3711 and 1549 for 5-17 y and 29,187 and 5653 for ≥18 y from 42 surveillance sites (30 PCV13, 12 PCV10, 2 PCV10/13) in 30 countries, primarily high-income (84%). Six years after PCV10/PCV13 introduction, pneumococcal meningitis declined 48-74% across products and PCV7 impact strata for children <5 y, 35-62% for 5-17 y and 0-36% for ≥18 y. Impact against PCV10-types at PCV10 sites, and PCV13-types at PCV13 sites was high for all age groups (<5 y: 96-100%; 5-17 y: 77-85%; ≥18 y: 73-85%). After switching from PCV7 to PCV10/13, increases in non-PCV13-types were generally low to none for all age groups. CONCLUSION: Pneumococcal meningitis declined in all age groups following PCV10/PCV13 introduction. Plateaus in non-PCV13-type meningitis suggest less replacement than for all IPD. Data from meningitis belt and high-burden settings were limited.

The generation time, representing the interval between infections in primary and secondary cases, is essential for understanding and predicting the transmission dynamics of seasonal influenza, including the real-time effective reproduction number (Rt). However, comprehensive generation time estimates for seasonal influenza, especially since the 2009 influenza pandemic, are lacking. We estimated the generation time utilizing data from a 7-site case-ascertained household study in the United States over two influenza seasons, 2021/2022 and 2022/2023. More than 200 individuals who tested positive for influenza and their household contacts were enrolled within 7 days of the first illness in the household. All participants were prospectively followed for 10 days, completing daily symptom diaries and collecting nasal swabs, which were then tested for influenza via RT-PCR. We analyzed these data by modifying a previously published Bayesian data augmentation approach that imputes infection times of cases to obtain both intrinsic (assuming no susceptible depletion) and realized (observed within household) generation times. We assessed the robustness of the generation time estimate by varying the incubation period, and generated estimates of the proportion of transmission occurring before symptomatic onset, the infectious period, and the latent period. We estimated a mean intrinsic generation time of 3.2 (95 % credible interval, CrI: 2.9-3.6) days, with a realized household generation time of 2.8 (95 % CrI: 2.7-3.0) days. The generation time exhibited limited sensitivity to incubation period variation. Estimates of the proportion of transmission that occurred before symptom onset, the infectious period, and the latent period were sensitive to variations in the incubation period. Our study contributes to the ongoing efforts to refine estimates of the generation time for influenza. Our estimates, derived from recent data following the COVID-19 pandemic, are consistent with previous pre-pandemic estimates, and will be incorporated into real-time Rt estimation efforts.

BACKGROUND: Effective vector control interventions, notably insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are indispensable for malaria control in Tanzania and elsewhere. However, the emergence of widespread insecticide resistance threatens the efficacy of these interventions. Monitoring of insecticide resistance is, therefore, critical for the selection and assessment of the programmatic impact of insecticide-based interventions. METHODS: The study was conducted country-wide across 22 sentinel districts of Tanzania between May and July 2023 using standard World Health Organization susceptibility test with 1×, 5×, and 10× of deltamethrin, permethrin, and alpha-cypermethrin and discriminating concentrations of 0.25% pirimiphos-methyl. Synergist assays were conducted to explore the underlying mechanisms of the observed phenotypic pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. Three- to five-day-old wild adult females in the first filiar generation of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) were used for the susceptibility bioassays. RESULTS: Anopheles gambiae s.l. were resistant to all pyrethroids at the discriminating dose in most sentinel districts except in Rorya, which remains fully susceptible, and Ushetu, which remains susceptible to deltamethrin but not permethrin. In 5 sites (Bukombe, Ukerewe, Kilwa, Kibondo, and Kakonko), the An. gambiae s.l. species exhibited strong resistance to pyrethroids surviving the 10 X concentrations (mortality rate < 98%). However, they remained fully susceptible to pirimiphos-methyl in almost all the sites except in Kibondo and Shinyanga. Likewise, there was full restoration to susceptibility to pyrethroid following pre-exposure of An. gambiae s.l. to piperonyl-butoxide (PBO) in 13 out of 16 sites. The 3 sites that exhibited partial restoration include Kakonko, Tandahimba, and Newala. CONCLUSION: The evidence of widespread pyrethroid resistance of the major malaria vector justifies the decision made by the Tanzania National Malaria Control Programme to transition to PBO-based ITNs. Without this switch, the gains achieved in malaria control could be compromised. Equally important, the lack of full restoration to susceptibility observed in three sentinel districts upon pre-exposure to PBO merits close monitoring, as there could be other underlying resistance mechanisms besides oxidase metabolic resistance.

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) that are ten-valent (PCV10) and 13-valent (PCV13) became available in 2010. We evaluated their global impact on invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) incidence in all ages. METHODS: Serotype-specific IPD cases and population denominators were obtained directly from surveillance sites using PCV10 or PCV13 in their national immunisation programmes and with a primary series uptake of at least 50%. Annual incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated comparing the incidence before any PCV with each year post-PCV10 or post-PCV13 introduction using Bayesian multi-level, mixed-effects Poisson regressions, by site and age group. All site-weighted average IRRs were estimated using linear mixed-effects regression, stratified by product and previous seven-valent PCV (PCV7) effect (none, moderate, or substantial). FINDINGS: Analyses included 32 PCV13 sites (488 758 cases) and 15 PCV10 sites (46 386 cases) in 30 countries, primarily high income (39 sites), using booster dose schedules (41 sites). By 6 years after PCV10 or PCV13 introduction, IPD due to PCV10-type serotypes and PCV10-related serotype 6A declined substantially for both products (age <5 years: 83-99% decline; ≥65 years: 54-96% decline). PCV7-related serotype 19A increases before PCV10 or PCV13 introduction were reversed at PCV13 sites (age <5 years: 61-79% decline relative to before any PCV; age ≥65 years: 7-26% decline) but increased at PCV10 sites (age <5 years: 1·6-2·3-fold; age ≥65 years: 3·6-4·9-fold). Serotype 3 IRRs had no consistent trends for either product or age group. Non-PCV13-type IPD increased similarly for both products (age <5 years: 2·3-3·3-fold; age ≥65 years: 1·7-2·3-fold). Despite different serotype 19A trends, all-serotype IPD declined similarly between products among children younger than 5 years (58-74%); among adults aged 65 years or older, declines were greater at PCV13 (25-29%) than PCV10 (4-14%) sites, but other differences between sites precluded attribution to product. INTERPRETATION: Long-term use of PCV10 or PCV13 reduced IPD substantially in young children and more moderately in older ages. Non-vaccine-type serotypes increased approximately two-fold to three-fold by 6 years after introduction of PCV10 or PCV13. Continuing serotype 19A increases at PCV10 sites and declines at PCV13 sites suggest that PCV13 use would further reduce IPD at PCV10 sites. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as part of the WHO Pneumococcal Vaccines Technical Coordination Project.

Globally, abuse of older people (AOP) affects one in six individuals aged 60 years and older every year. Despite the widespread prevalence of AOP, evidence-based interventions for preventing and responding to this issue are insufficient. To address this gap, WHO proposed an initiative to accelerate the development of effective interventions for AOP across all country income levels. In the first phase, the initiative identified 89 promising interventions across a total of 101 evaluations or descriptions, which led to the creation of a public database. Most interventions targeted physical, psychological, and financial abuse and neglect, were implemented in the USA, and focused on victims or potential victims. These interventions were primarily delivered by social workers and nurses, usually in health-care facilities and community centres. Face-to-face delivery was common. Additionally, 28 (28%) of the 101 evaluations used randomised controlled trial designs. The results of this Review can be used to identify interventions that are ready for a rigorous outcome evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Tracking the emergence, introduction and spread of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern are essential for informing public health strategies. In 2021, Cambodia faced two major epidemic waves of SARS-CoV-2 triggered by the successive rise of the Alpha and Delta variants. METHODS: Phylodynamic analysis of 1,163 complete SARS-CoV-2 genomes from Cambodia, along with global sequences, were conducted between February and September 2021 to infer viral introductions, molecular epidemiology and population dynamics. The relationship between epidemic trends and control strategies were evaluated. Bayesian phylogeographic reconstruction was employed to estimate and contrast the spatiotemporal dynamics of the Alpha and Delta variants over time. RESULTS: Here we reveal that the Alpha variant displays rapid lineage diversification, accompanied by the acquisition of a spike E484K mutation that coincides with the national implementation of mass COVID-19 vaccination. Despite nationwide control strategies and increased vaccination coverage, the Alpha variant was quickly displaced by Delta variants that exhibits a higher effective reproductive number. Phylogeographic inference indicates that the Alpha variant was introduced through south-central region of Cambodia, with strong diffusion rates from the capital of Phnom Penh to other provinces, while the Delta variant likely entered the country via the northern border provinces. CONCLUSIONS: Continual genomic surveillance and sequencing efforts, in combination with public health strategies, play a vital role in effectively tracking and responding to the emergence, evolution and dissemination of future emerging variants. | Tracking how SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, changes over time is important for public health. In Cambodia, there were two major COVID-19 waves in 2021, driven by the Alpha and Delta variants. We analyzed 1,163 virus samples from Cambodia, plus samples from other places, to understand how these variants spread. We found that the Alpha variant quickly spread and changed as Cambodia started a mass vaccination campaign. Despite efforts to control it, the Delta variant, which spreads more easily, soon took over. The Alpha variant likely came into Cambodia from the south, while the Delta variant probably entered from the north. Monitoring these changes helps us respond better to future outbreaks. | eng

BACKGROUND: Outbreaks of emerging multidrug-resistant organisms (eMDROs), including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Candida auris, have been reported among severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) patients. We describe eMDRO clusters in SARS-CoV-2 units and associated infection control (IC) practices early in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective survey of a convenience sample of health departments in 11 states to describe clusters of eMDROs that began before November 1, 2020 and involved SARS-CoV-2 units. Cluster characteristics and IC practices during the cluster period were assessed using a standardized outbreak report form, and descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 18 eMDRO clusters (10 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, 6 C auris, 1 carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 1 carbapenem-resistant A baumannii) in 18 health care facilities involving 397 patients were reported from 10 states. During the cluster period, 60% of facilities reported a shortage of isolation gowns, 69% extended use of gowns, and 67% reported difficulty obtaining preferred disinfectants. Reduced frequency of hand hygiene audits was reported in 85% of acute care hospitals during the cluster period compared with before the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in IC practices and supply shortages were identified in facilities with eMDRO outbreaks during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and might have contributed to eMDRO transmission.

BACKGROUND: Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) has high efficacy against HIV-1 acquisition. Seventy-two prospective studies of daily oral F/TDF PrEP were conducted to evaluate HIV-1 incidence, drug resistance, adherence, and bone and renal safety in diverse settings. METHODS: HIV-1 incidence was calculated from incident HIV-1 diagnoses after PrEP initiation and within 60 days of discontinuation. Tenofovir concentrations in dried blood spots (DBS), drug resistance, and bone/renal safety indicators were evaluated in a subset of studies. RESULTS: Among 17 274 participants, there were 101 cases with new HIV-1 diagnosis (.77 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .63-.94). In 78 cases with resistance data, 18 (23%) had M184I or V, 1 (1.3%) had K65R, and 3 (3.8%) had both mutations. In 54 cases with tenofovir concentration data from DBS, 45 (83.3%), 2 (3.7%), 6 (11.1%), and 1 (1.9%) had average adherence of <2, 2-3, 4-6, and ≥7 doses/wk, respectively, and the corresponding incidence was 3.9 (95% CI: 2.9-5.3), .24 (.060-.95), .27 (.12-.60), and .054 (.008-.38) per 100 person-years. Adherence was low in younger participants, Hispanic/Latinx and Black participants, cisgender women, and transgender women. Bone and renal adverse event incidence rates were 0.69 and 11.8 per 100 person-years, respectively, consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging the largest pooled analysis of global PrEP studies to date, we demonstrate that F/TDF is safe and highly effective, even with less than daily dosing, in diverse clinical settings, geographies, populations, and routes of HIV-1 exposure.

BACKGROUND: Stigma and lack of social support are barriers to HIV prevention, especially among cisgender Black women in the United States. While HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can decrease HIV transmission, PrEP initiation and adherence remains low among Black women, especially in the U.S. South. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize experiences with stigma and social support among PrEP-naïve and PrEP-experienced Black cisgender women in Mississippi. DESIGN: Qualitative study in which semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted. METHODS: We purposively recruited PrEP-naïve cisgender Black women who met PrEP indications to participate in focus groups and all PrEP-experienced cisgender Black women at a sexual health clinic in Jackson, Mississippi to participate in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze focus group and interview transcripts. RESULTS: A total of 37 PrEP-naïve Black cisgender women participated across 6 focus groups and 8 PrEP-experienced cisgender Black women completed semi-structured interviews. Four themes were identified: (1) the intersection of gendered racism, discrimination, and HIV stigma, (2) enacted and anticipated PrEP stigma, (3) stigma mitigation strategies and PrEP adherence, and (4) social support's role in PrEP initiation and adherence. PrEP-naïve and -experienced Black women discussed the negative consequence that sexual stigmatization and gendered racism has on HIV testing. PrEP-naïve Black women discussed how HIV stigma decreases PrEP initiation. Conversely, PrEP-experienced Black women were able to identify strategies they utilized to mitigate stigma. PrEP-experienced Black women discussed how differing levels of social support impact their PrEP use. CONCLUSION: Improving social support and stigma mitigation strategies could help improve PrEP initiation and adherence among cisgender Black women at-risk of acquiring HIV in the U.S. South. Educating communities on PrEP, and training providers on stigma-mitigating strategies when serving Black women in the U.S. South who are seeking HIV prevention is paramount. | PrEP initiation and adherence among Black cisgender women in Mississippi: The role of HIV and PrEP stigma and social supportWhy was the study done?Stigma and lack of social support have been demonstrated as barriers to HIV prevention, especially among cisgender Black women in the United States (U.S.). While HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a HIV prevention medication, has the ability to decrease HIV transmission, rates of starting PrEP remain low among Black women, especially in the U.S. South. Improving PrEP programs for US Black women calls for understanding how stigma and social support impact PrEP use among Black women.What did the researchers do?We recruited cisgender Black women who was eligible for PrEP but have never taken PrEP (PrEP-naïve) to participate in focus groups and cisgender Black women who have taken PrEP (PrEP-experienced) to participate in one-on-one in-depth interviews from healthcare clinics in Jackson, Mississippi. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze focus group and interview transcripts.What did the researchers find?A total of 37 Black cisgender women across six groups participated in focus groups and eight cisgender Black women were interviewed. PrEP-naïve women reported: · HIV stigma in the community, which can lead to anticipated PrEP stigma · Experiencing sex-based sexual stigmatization at provider’s offices when seeking HIV testing PrEP-experienced Black women reported: Experiencing stigma when disclosing their PrEP use, such as their family and friends thinking that the woman and/or her partner is living with HIV. PrEP-experienced Black women who were in serodifferent partnership and had others in their network who knew about PrEP received support to take PrEP.What do the findings mean?Improving social support and stigma mitigation strategies could help improve PrEP initiation and adherence among cisgender Black women at-risk of acquiring HIV in the U.S. South. This includes educating communities on HIV and PrEP, and training providers on stigma-mitigating strategies when serving Black women in the U.S. South. | eng

Hospital surfaces are known to contribute to the spread of healthcare-associated antimicrobial pathogens. Environmental sampling can help locate reservoirs and determine intervention strategies, although sampling and detection can be labor intensive. Composite approaches may help reduce time and costs associated with sampling and detection. We investigated optimum surface areas for sampling antimicrobial-resistant organisms (AROs) with a single side of cellulose sponge, created theoretical composites (TC) by adding recovery results from multiple optimum areas, then compared the TC to the standard Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sampling method (one sponge using all sides, whole tool; (WT)). Five AROs were evaluated: carbapenemase-producing KPC+ Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC), Acinetobacter baumannii (AB), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE) and Clostridioides difficile spores (CD). Steel coupons comprising four surface areas (323; 645; 1,290 and 2,258 cm2) were inoculated, dried, and sampled with one sampling pass using the larger side (face) or the smaller side (edge) of a pre-moistened cellulose sponge tool. Based on the optimum areas determined for each organism, composite areas were 1,290 cm2 for MRSA and VRE, 1,936 cm2 for AB, 2,580 cm2 for CD spores and 3,870 cm2 for KPC. Total colony forming units (CFU) recovered using a composite approach was greater or comparable than using multiple WT samplings (over the same area as the composite) for MRSA, VRE and AB (130%; 144% and 95%) yet less than if using multiple WT samplings for KP and CD (47% and 66%). We propose a conservative composite sampling strategy if the target organism is unknown; 323 cm2 sampling area for each of the four sides of the sponge, (1290 cm2 total). The conservative composite sampling strategy improved the recovery of KP (from 47% to 85% of multiple WT samplings), while MRSA, VRE, AB and CD (131%; 144%; 97% and 66%) remained within 5% to that of the optimum area TC.