Numerous studies have investigated vaccine-induced correlates of protection (CoP) against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but data on infection-induced CoP are limited. Given differences between vaccine- and infection-induced immune responses, in conjunction with low vaccination in many US populations, a better understanding of infection-induced CoP is needed. We used residual sera from a mid-2020 Rhode Island serosurvey of healthcare professionals (HCP) and corresponding state-collected SARS-CoV-2 testing data through February 2021 to generate an analytic cohort of HCP with a first SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to serosurvey blood collection and multiple viral tests after blood collection to assess for reinfection (defined as a positive viral test ≥90 days after their first positive). We tested sera for levels of IgG and IgA targeting ancestral spike (S), receptor-binding domain (RBD), or nucleocapsid (N). We used adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios to assess the association between categorical antibody level and the risk of subsequent reinfection. Among 170 HCP included in this analysis (median age = 47 years; interquartile range: 35-55 years), 30 were reinfected during the analytic period. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios indicated that higher levels of anti-S or anti-RBD IgG were significantly associated with a lower risk of reinfection. These findings support the use of anti-S or anti-RBD IgG levels as markers of immunologic protection, such as in population serosurveys, or immune-bridging studies in settings of high prevalence of prior infection.  IMPORTANCEThe measurement of antibodies in blood is a relatively simple process and commonly used to estimate overall levels of past infection in populations. But, if someone has antibodies, does this mean that they are protected from being infected again? And are people with higher levels of antibody better protected? There are good data in the literature exploring how antibodies from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination are associated with protection. But, there is still a lot to learn about protection conferred by antibodies that develop after a severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In our study, we measure the levels of six different antibody types developed after infection and compare levels to the risk of subsequent infection to better understand which antibody types are best associated with protection. Our data are important for improving studies that use antibodies as proxies for protection, such as population immunity estimates, or those assessing new prevention products.

BACKGROUND: Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) has high efficacy against HIV-1 acquisition. Seventy-two prospective studies of daily oral F/TDF PrEP were conducted to evaluate HIV-1 incidence, drug resistance, adherence, and bone and renal safety in diverse settings. METHODS: HIV-1 incidence was calculated from incident HIV-1 diagnoses after PrEP initiation and within 60 days of discontinuation. Tenofovir concentrations in dried blood spots (DBS), drug resistance, and bone/renal safety indicators were evaluated in a subset of studies. RESULTS: Among 17 274 participants, there were 101 cases with new HIV-1 diagnosis (.77 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .63-.94). In 78 cases with resistance data, 18 (23%) had M184I or V, 1 (1.3%) had K65R, and 3 (3.8%) had both mutations. In 54 cases with tenofovir concentration data from DBS, 45 (83.3%), 2 (3.7%), 6 (11.1%), and 1 (1.9%) had average adherence of <2, 2-3, 4-6, and ≥7 doses/wk, respectively, and the corresponding incidence was 3.9 (95% CI: 2.9-5.3), .24 (.060-.95), .27 (.12-.60), and .054 (.008-.38) per 100 person-years. Adherence was low in younger participants, Hispanic/Latinx and Black participants, cisgender women, and transgender women. Bone and renal adverse event incidence rates were 0.69 and 11.8 per 100 person-years, respectively, consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging the largest pooled analysis of global PrEP studies to date, we demonstrate that F/TDF is safe and highly effective, even with less than daily dosing, in diverse clinical settings, geographies, populations, and routes of HIV-1 exposure.

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective pharmaceutical intervention that prevents HIV infection, but PrEP uptake across the US has been slow among men who have sex with men (MSM), especially among Black/African American (B/AA) and Hispanic /Latino (H/L) MSM. This study investigates the acceptability and essential components of a peer-driven intervention (PDI) for promoting PrEP uptake among MSM, with a specific focus on B/AA and H/L communities. METHODS: We conducted 28 semi-structured, qualitative interviews with MSM in southern New England to explore the components of a PDI, including attitudes, content, and effective communication methods. A purposive sampling strategy was used to recruit diverse participants who reflect the communities with the highest burden of HIV infection. RESULTS: Of 28 study participants, the median age was 28 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 25, 35). The sample comprised B/AA (39%, n = 11) and H/L (50%, n = 14) individuals. Notably, nearly half of the participants (46%) were current PrEP users. We found that many participants were in favor of using a PDI approach for promoting PrEP. Additionally, several participants showed interest in becoming peer educators themselves. They emphasized the need for strong communication skills to effectively teach others about PrEP. Moreover, participants noted that peer education should cover key topics like how PrEP works, how effective it is, and any possible side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that effective PDIs, facilitated by well-trained peers knowledgeable about PrEP, could enhance PrEP uptake among MSM, addressing health disparities and potentially reducing HIV transmission in B/AA and H/L communities.

Partner notification services (PNS) offers opportunities to discuss HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and provide referrals. We evaluated the PrEP care cascade among men who have sex with men (MSM) engaging in PNS within a sexually transmitted infections clinic. Among 121 MSM eligible for PrEP during PNS, 21% subsequently initiated PrEP.

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) such as syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia have significantly increased over the past decade in the United States. Doxycycline as chemoprophylaxis (i.e., post-exposure prophylaxis [PEP]) offers promise for addressing bacterial STIs. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the safety of longer-term doxycycline use (defined as eight or more weeks) in the context of potential use as STI chemoprophylaxis through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. METHODS: This review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search MEDLINE/PubMed for clinical studies published from August 2003 through January 2023 that reported on adverse events with doxycycline use with a focus on side-effects and metabolic effects of long-term use. RESULTS: A total of 67 studies were included in the systematic review. Overall, studies on longer-term doxycycline use reported 0% to over 50% adverse events ranging from mild to severe. Most common adverse events included gastrointestinal symptoms (i.e., nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain), dermatologic (i.e., rash), and neurological (i.e., headache and dizziness) symptoms. Discontinuation of doxycycline due to adverse events was relatively uncommon in most studies. A meta-analysis of placebo controlled clinical trials (N = 18) revealed gastrointestinal and dermatological adverse events were more likely to occur in the doxycycline group. CONCLUSION: Longer-term (8+ weeks) doxycycline use is generally safe and may be associated with minor side-effects. Further research is needed on the potential metabolic impact of longer-term doxycycline use.

BACKGROUND: Telehealth offers one approach to improving access to Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) prevention and care services. Therefore, we described recent telehealth use among those providing STI related care and identified opportunities for improving STI service delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the DocStyles web-based, panel survey conducted by Porter Novelli from September 14 to November 10, 2021, 1,500 healthcare providers were asked about their current telehealth usage, demographics, and practice characteristics, and compared STI providers (>10% of time spent on STI care and prevention) to non-STI providers. RESULTS: Among those whose practice consisted of at least 10% STI visits (n = 597), 81.7% used telehealth compared to 75.7% for those whose practice consisted of less than 10% STI visits (n = 903). Among the providers with at least 10% STI visits in their practice, telehealth use was highest among obstetrics and gynecology specialists (OB/GYNs), those practicing in suburban areas, and those practicing in the South. Among providers whose practice consisted of at least 10% STI visits and who used telehealth (n = 488), the majority were female and OB/GYNs practicing in suburban areas of the South. After controlling for age, gender, provider specialty, and geographic location of their practice, providers whose practice consisted of at least 10% STI visits had increased odds (OR:1.51, 95% CI:1.16-1.97) of using telehealth compared to providers whose visits consisted of less than 10% STI visits. CONCLUSIONS: Given the widespread use of telehealth, efforts to optimize delivery of STI care and prevention via telehealth are important to improve access to services and address STIs in the United States.

Admissions to jails and prisons in the United States number 10 million yearly; persons entering locked correctional facilities have high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). These individuals come disproportionately from communities of color, with lower access to care and prevention, compared with the United States as a whole. Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors present results of a systematic review of literature published since 2012 on STIs in US jails, prisons, Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention centers, and juvenile facilities. This updates an earlier review of STIs in short-term facilities. This current review contributed to new recommendations in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2021 treatment guidelines for STIs, advising screening for Trichomonas in women entering correctional facilities. The current review also synthesizes recommendations on screening: in particular, opt-out testing is superior to opt-in protocols. Carceral interventions-managing diagnosed cases and preventing new infections from occurring (eg, by initiating human immunodeficiency virus preexposure prophylaxis before release)-can counteract structural racism in healthcare.

CONTEXT: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) continue to increase in the United States. Publicly funded sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics provide important safety net services for communities at greater risk for STIs. However, creating financially sustainable models of STI care remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE: Characterization of clinic insurance billing practices and patient willingness to use insurance. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey assessment of clinic administrators and patients. SETTING: Twenty-six STD clinics and 4138 patients attending these clinics in high STD morbidity metropolitan statistical areas in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Clinic administrators and patients of these clinics. INTERVENTION: Survey assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Insurance billing practices of STD clinics and patient insurance status and willingness to use their insurance. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of clinics (4/26) indicated that they billed only Medicaid, 58% (15/26) billed both Medicaid and private insurance, 27% (7/26) did not bill for any health insurance, and none (0%) billed only private health insurance companies. Of 4138 patients surveyed, just more than one-half of patients (52.6%) were covered by some form of health insurance. More than one-half (57.2%) of all patients covered by health insurance indicated that they would be willing to use their health insurance for that visit. After adjusting for patient demographics and clinic characteristics, the patients covered by government insurance were 3 times as likely (odds ratio: 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 2.44-4.10) than patients covered by private insurance to be willing to use their insurance for their visit. CONCLUSION: Opportunities exist for sustainable STI services through the enhancement of billing practices in STD clinics. The STD clinics provide care to large numbers of individuals who are both insured and who are willing to use their insurance for their care. As Medicaid expansion continues across the country, efforts focused on improving reimbursement rates for Medicaid may improve financial sustainability of STD clinics.

We estimated the distributions of duration of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid shedding and time to reinfection among 137 persons with at least two positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) results from March to September 2020. We analyzed gaps of varying length between subsequent positive and negative NAAT results and estimated a mean duration of nucleic acid shedding of 30.1 (95% CI 26.3, 34.5) days. The mean time to reinfection was 89.1 (95% CI 75.3, 103.5) days. Together, these indicate that a 90-day period between positive NAAT results can reliably define reinfection in immunocompetent persons although reinfection can occur at shorter intervals.

These guidelines for the treatment of persons who have or are at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) were updated by CDC after consultation with professionals knowledgeable in the field of STIs who met in Atlanta, Georgia, June 11-14, 2019. The information in this report updates the 2015 guidelines. These guidelines discuss 1) updated recommendations for treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis; 2) addition of metronidazole to the recommended treatment regimen for pelvic inflammatory disease; 3) alternative treatment options for bacterial vaginosis; 4) management of Mycoplasma genitalium; 5) human papillomavirus vaccine recommendations and counseling messages; 6) expanded risk factors for syphilis testing among pregnant women; 7) one-time testing for hepatitis C infection; 8) evaluation of men who have sex with men after sexual assault; and 9) two-step testing for serologic diagnosis of genital herpes simplex virus. Physicians and other health care providers can use these guidelines to assist in prevention and treatment of STIs.

Healthcare personnel are recognized to be at higher risk for infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. We conducted a serologic survey in 15 hospitals and 56 nursing homes across Rhode Island, USA, during July 17-August 28, 2020. Overall seropositivity among 9,863 healthcare personnel was 4.6% (95% CI 4.2%-5.0%) but varied 4-fold between hospital personnel (3.1%, 95% CI 2.7%-3.5%) and nursing home personnel (13.1%, 95% CI 11.5%-14.9%). Within nursing homes, prevalence was highest among personnel working in coronavirus disease units (24.1%; 95% CI 20.6%-27.8%). Adjusted analysis showed that in hospitals, nurses and receptionists/medical assistants had a higher likelihood of seropositivity than physicians. In nursing homes, nursing assistants and social workers/case managers had higher likelihoods of seropositivity than occupational/physical/speech therapists. Nursing home personnel in all occupations had elevated seropositivity compared with hospital counterparts. Additional mitigation strategies are needed to protect nursing home personnel from infection, regardless of occupation.