The protocol of a randomized trial is the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting and external review. However, trial protocols vary in their completeness and often do not address key elements of design and conduct. The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement was first published in 2013 as guidance to improve the completeness of trial protocols. Periodic updates incorporating the latest evidence and best practices are needed to ensure that the guidance remains relevant to users. Here, we aimed to systematically update the SPIRIT recommendations for minimum items to address in the protocol of a randomized trial. We completed a scoping review and developed a project-specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence to generate a list of potential changes to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by lead authors of existing SPIRIT/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment) and other reporting guidelines (TIDieR). The potential modifications were rated in a three-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting. Overall, 317 individuals participated in the Delphi consensus process and 30 experts attended the consensus meeting. The process led to the addition of two new protocol items, revision to five items, deletion/merger of five items, and integration of key items from other relevant reporting guidelines. Notable changes include a new open science section, additional emphasis on the assessment of harms and description of interventions and comparators, and a new item on how patients and the public will be involved in trial design, conduct and reporting. The updated SPIRIT 2025 statement consists of an evidence-based checklist of 34 minimum items to address in a trial protocol, along with a diagram illustrating the schedule of enrollment, interventions and assessments for trial participants. To facilitate implementation, we also developed an expanded version of the SPIRIT 2025 checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document. Widespread endorsement and adherence to the updated SPIRIT 2025 statement have the potential to enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators and other reviewers.

IMPORTANCE: The protocol of a randomised trial is the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and external review. However, trial protocols vary in their completeness and often do not address key elements of design and conduct. The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement was first published in 2013 as guidance to improve the completeness of trial protocols. Periodic updates incorporating the latest evidence and best practices are needed to ensure that the guidance remains relevant to users. OBJECTIVE: To systematically update the SPIRIT recommendations for minimum items to address in the protocol of a randomised trial. DESIGN: We completed a scoping review and developed a project specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence to generate a list of potential changes to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by lead authors of existing SPIRIT/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment) and other reporting guidelines (TIDieR). The potential modifications were rated in a three-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting. FINDINGS: Overall, 317 individuals participated in the Delphi consensus process and 30 experts attended the consensus meeting. The process led to the addition of two new protocol items, revision to five items, deletion/merger of five items, and integration of key items from other relevant reporting guidelines. Notable changes include a new open science section, additional emphasis on the assessment of harms and description of interventions and comparators, and a new item on how patients and the public will be involved in trial design, conduct, and reporting. The updated SPIRIT 2025 statement consists of an evidence based checklist of 34 minimum items to address in a trial protocol, along with a diagram illustrating the schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments for trial participants. To facilitate implementation, we also developed an expanded version of the SPIRIT 2025 checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Widespread endorsement and adherence to the updated SPIRIT 2025 statement have the potential to enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators, and other reviewers.

IMPORTANCE: The protocol of a randomized trial is the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and external review. However, trial protocols vary in their completeness and often do not address key elements of design and conduct. The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement was first published in 2013 as guidance to improve the completeness of trial protocols. Periodic updates incorporating the latest evidence and best practices are needed to ensure that the guidance remains relevant to users. Herein, we systematically update the SPIRIT recommendations for minimum items to address in the protocol of a randomized trial. OBSERVATIONS: We completed a scoping review and developed a project specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence to generate a list of potential changes to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by lead authors of existing SPIRIT/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extensions (harms, outcomes, nonpharmacological treatment) and other reporting guidelines (Template for Intervention Description and Replication [TIDieR]). The potential modifications were rated in a 3-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting. Overall, 317 individuals participated in the Delphi consensus process and 30 experts attended the consensus meeting. The process led to the addition of 2 new protocol items, revision to 5 items, deletion/merger of 5 items, and integration of key items from other relevant reporting guidelines. Notable changes include a new open-science section, additional emphasis on the assessment of harms and description of interventions and comparators, and a new item on how patients and the public will be involved in trial design, conduct, and reporting. The updated SPIRIT 2025 statement consists of an evidence based checklist of 34 minimum items to address in a trial protocol, along with a diagram illustrating the schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments for trial participants. To facilitate implementation, we also developed an expanded version of the SPIRIT 2025 checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Widespread endorsement and adherence to the updated SPIRIT 2025 statement have the potential to enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries, policy makers, regulators, and other reviewers.

IMPORTANCE: The protocol of a randomised trial is the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and external review. However, trial protocols vary in their completeness and often do not address key elements of design and conduct. The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement was first published in 2013 as guidance to improve the completeness of trial protocols. Periodic updates incorporating the latest evidence and best practices are needed to ensure that the guidance remains relevant to users. OBJECTIVE: To systematically update the SPIRIT recommendations for minimum items to address in the protocol of a randomised trial. DESIGN: We completed a scoping review and developed a project specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence to generate a list of potential changes to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by lead authors of existing SPIRIT/CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment) and other reporting guidelines (TIDieR). The potential modifications were rated in a three-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting. FINDINGS: Overall, 317 individuals participated in the Delphi consensus process and 30 experts attended the consensus meeting. The process led to the addition of two new protocol items, revision to five items, deletion/merger of five items, and integration of key items from other relevant reporting guidelines. Notable changes include a new open science section, additional emphasis on the assessment of harms and description of interventions and comparators, and a new item on how patients and the public will be involved in trial design, conduct, and reporting. The updated SPIRIT 2025 statement consists of an evidence-based checklist of 34 minimum items to address in a trial protocol, along with a diagram illustrating the schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments for trial participants. To facilitate implementation, we also developed an expanded version of the SPIRIT 2025 checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Widespread endorsement and adherence to the updated SPIRIT 2025 statement have the potential to enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators, and other reviewers.

BACKGROUND: Well designed and properly executed randomised trials are considered the most reliable evidence on the benefits of healthcare interventions. However, there is overwhelming evidence that the quality of reporting is not optimal. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement was designed to improve the quality of reporting and provides a minimum set of items to be included in a report of a randomised trial. CONSORT was first published in 1996, then updated in 2001 and 2010. Here, we present the updated CONSORT 2025 statement, which aims to account for recent methodological advancements and feedback from end users. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of the literature and developed a project-specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence related to CONSORT, to generate a list of potential changes to the checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by the lead authors of existing CONSORT extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment), other related reporting guidelines (TIDieR) and recommendations from other sources (e.g., personal communications). The list of potential changes to the checklist was assessed in a large, international, online, three-round Delphi survey involving 317 participants and discussed at a two-day online expert consensus meeting of 30 invited international experts. RESULTS: We have made substantive changes to the CONSORT checklist. We added seven new checklist items, revised three items, deleted one item, and integrated several items from key CONSORT extensions. We also restructured the CONSORT checklist, with a new section on open science. The CONSORT 2025 statement consists of a 30-item checklist of essential items that should be included when reporting the results of a randomised trial and a diagram for documenting the flow of participants through the trial. To facilitate implementation of CONSORT 2025, we have also developed an expanded version of the CONSORT 2025 checklist, with bullet points eliciting critical elements of each item. CONCLUSIONS: Authors, editors, reviewers, and other potential users should use CONSORT 2025 when writing and evaluating manuscripts of randomised trials to ensure that trial reports are clear and transparent.

Critical appraisal of the quality of randomised trials is possible only if their design, conduct, analysis, and results are completely and accurately reported. Without transparent reporting of the methods and results, readers will not be able to fully evaluate the reliability and validity of trial findings. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement aims to improve the quality of reporting and provides a minimum set of items to be included in a report of a randomised trial. CONSORT was first published in 1996 and was updated in 2001 and 2010. CONSORT comprises a checklist of essential items that should be included in reports of randomised trials and a diagram for documenting the flow of participants through a trial. The CONSORT statement has been updated (CONSORT 2025) to reflect recent methodological advancements and feedback from end users, ensuring that it remains fit for purpose. Here, we present the updated CONSORT explanation and elaboration document, which has been extensively revised and describes the rationale and scientific background for each CONSORT 2025 checklist item and provides published examples of good reporting. The objective is to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of CONSORT 2025 and provide guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of their trials and ensure trial reports are complete, and transparent.

IMPORTANCE: Well-designed and properly executed randomized trials are considered the most reliable evidence on the benefits of health care interventions. However, there is overwhelming evidence that the quality of reporting is not optimal. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement was designed to improve the quality of reporting and provides a minimum set of items to be included in a report of a randomized trial. CONSORT was first published in 1996, then updated in 2001 and 2010. Herein, we present the updated CONSORT 2025 statement, which aims to account for recent methodological advancements and feedback from end users. OBSERVATIONS: We conducted a scoping review of the literature and developed a project-specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence related to CONSORT to generate a list of potential changes to the checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by the lead authors of existing CONSORT extensions (harms, outcomes, nonpharmacological treatment), other related reporting guidelines (Template for Intervention Description and Replication [TIDieR]), and recommendations from other sources (eg, personal communications). The list of potential changes to the checklist was assessed in a large, international, online, 3-round Delphi survey involving 317 participants and discussed at a 2-day online expert consensus meeting of 30 invited international experts. We have made substantive changes to the CONSORT checklist. We added 7 new checklist items, revised 3 items, deleted 1 item, and integrated several items from key CONSORT extensions. We also restructured the CONSORT checklist, with a new section on open science. The CONSORT 2025 statement consists of a 30-item checklist of essential items that should be included when reporting the results of a randomized trial and a diagram for documenting the flow of participants through the trial. To facilitate implementation of CONSORT 2025, we have also developed an expanded version of the CONSORT 2025 checklist, with bullet points eliciting critical elements of each item. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Authors, editors, reviewers, and other potential users should use CONSORT 2025 when writing and evaluating manuscripts of randomized trials to ensure that trial reports are clear and transparent.

Invasive organisms may cause ecologic, economic, and public health harm. Aedes japonicus is an invasive mosquito species of known ecologic and public health importance that has widely spread throughout the eastern USA since initially being recognized in Connecticut in 1998. Here, we report the known distributions of Ae. japonicus within the Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSMNP) since its initial recognition in the park in 2004. From 2006 to 2022, we sampled eggs, larvae, and adult life stages through targeted, haphazard, and convenience collections. Through these efforts, we surveyed 23 (54.7%) of the 42 watersheds within the GSMNP. Aedes japonicus was present in 19 (82.6%) of the sampled watersheds, and the species was confirmed, in some instances, at the same location over multiple years, suggesting it remains entrenched. This species was observed in 45.2% of the GSMNP watersheds at elevations ranging from 347 to 1,478 m. Naturally occurring containers (i.e., riverine rock pools) were common collection sites in this study. The results of our findings are presented in the context of the species distribution within the park, the public health relevance given the GSMNP's public visitation rate (>12 million annually), potential species interactions, and the persistence of this species over the multiyear study.

OBJECTIVES: Electronic case reporting (eCR), a cornerstone of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Data Modernization Initiative, automates bidirectional information sharing between electronic health records and public health agencies for reportable conditions. eCR grew rapidly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. CDC and the Florida Department of Health (FDOH) collaborated to compare the completeness and timeliness of eCR with that of traditional reporting methods for COVID-19-related patient encounters at 4 health care organizations in Florida in December 2020. METHODS: Electronic initial case reports (eICRs) were matched to corresponding (ie, for same patient encounter) electronic laboratory reports (ELRs) or manually transmitted documents. We extracted and compared selected data from each report type across matched reports for completeness and timeliness. RESULTS: Most (>98%) eICRs provided earlier notification of COVID-19 to the local public health department than corresponding ELRs or manually transmitted documents. Additionally, eICRs provided more data on race and ethnicity (>90%) than ELRs (71%) or manually transmitted documents (<5%). CONCLUSIONS: Advancing implementation of eCR nationwide may provide more complete and timely case data than ELR or manually transmitted documents to guide public health action.

BACKGROUND: During the U.S. COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE), healthcare providers were required to report all administered COVID-19 vaccines in Immunization Information Systems (IIS), a key data source for vaccine effectiveness (VE) evaluations. Expiration of the PHE and commercialization of COVID-19 vaccines raised concerns about IIS data completeness. Parental report is an alternative source of vaccination data but might be inaccurate. METHODS: Using VE surveillance network data during May 2021-October 2023, we compared parent-reported and documented COVID-19 vaccine doses for patients aged 5-18 years admitted to 35 hospitals in 25 states, overall and by case/control status. We calculated percent agreement, kappa, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (NPV) of parental report. We compared proportions of patients with discordant vaccination history by demographics and incident SARS-CoV-2 infection status. We estimated VE separately using parental report and independently documented sources. RESULTS: Among 3262 patients, agreement between parent-reported and documented COVID-19 vaccination doses was 88 % (kappa = 0.77). Most discordant pairs (346/390) were because of parental over-reporting of doses. Among patients documented as unvaccinated, most (specificity = 90 %) were reported as such by parents; nearly all reported as unvaccinated by parents had no documented vaccination (NPV = 99 %). Discordance decreased with shorter admission-to-interview intervals and varied regionally from 8 % in the Midwest to 16 % in the West. Proportions of discordant reports were similar between patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection (11 % vs 13 %). Median days from last vaccine dose to hospital admission was 167 (IQR: 86-288). VE of two doses (99 % original formula) against COVID-19-related hospitalization was 58 % using documented sources and 60 % using parental report. CONCLUSIONS: Parental report of COVID-19 vaccination agreed strongly with documented sources, especially among unvaccinated patients. Despite discrepancies from parental overreporting, VE estimates from both sources were similar. As reliance on parental report increases, reducing admission-to-interview time is important for accurate vaccination history.

IMPORTANCE: An estimated 1% to 3% of children with SARS-CoV-2 infection will develop post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the odds of PCC among children with COVID-19 vaccination prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with odds among unvaccinated children. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this case-control study, children were enrolled in a multisite longitudinal pediatric cohort from July 27, 2021, to September 1, 2022, and followed up through May 2023. Analysis used a case (PCC reported)-control (no PCC reported) design and included children aged 5 to 17 years whose first real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred during the study period, who were COVID-19 vaccine age-eligible at the time of infection, and who completed a PCC survey at least 60 days after infection. From December 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, children had weekly SARS-CoV-2 testing and were surveyed regarding PCC (≥1 new or ongoing symptom lasting ≥1 month after infection). EXPOSURES: COVID-19 mRNA vaccination status at time of infection was the exposure of interest; participants were categorized as vaccinated (≥2-dose series completed ≥14 days before infection) or unvaccinated. Vaccination status was verified through vaccination cards or vaccine registry and/or medical records when available. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Main outcomes were estimates of the odds of PCC symptoms. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds of PCC among vaccinated children compared with odds of PCC among unvaccinated children. RESULTS: A total of 622 participants were included, with 28 (5%) case participants and 594 (95%) control participants. Median (IQR) age was 10.0 (7.0-11.9) years for case participants and 10.3 (7.8-12.7) years for control participants (P = .37). Approximately half of both groups reported female sex (13 case participants [46%] and 287 control participants [48%]). Overall, 57% of case participants (16 children) and 77% of control participants (458 children) were vaccinated (P = .05). After adjusting for demographic characteristics, number of acute COVID-19 symptoms, and baseline health, COVID-19 vaccination was associated with decreased odds of 1 or more PCC symptom (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19-0.98) and 2 or more PCC symptoms (aOR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.69). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was associated with reduced odds of PCC in children. The aORs correspond to an estimated 57% and 73% reduced likelihood of 1 or more and 2 or more PCC symptoms, respectively, among vaccinated vs unvaccinated children. These findings suggest benefits of COVID-19 vaccination beyond those associated with protection against acute COVID-19 and may encourage increased pediatric uptake.

IMPORTANCE: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is an uncommon but severe hyperinflammatory illness that occurs 2 to 6 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Presentation overlaps with other conditions, and risk factors for severity differ by patient. Characterizing patterns of MIS-C presentation can guide efforts to reduce misclassification, categorize phenotypes, and identify patients at risk for severe outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To characterize phenotypic clusters of MIS-C and identify clusters with increased clinical severity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort study, MIS-C phenotypic clusters were inferred using latent class analysis applied to the largest cohort to date of cases from US national surveillance data from 55 US public health jurisdictions. Cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention MIS-C national surveillance program as of April 4, 2023, with symptom onset on or before December 31, 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-nine clinical signs and symptoms were selected for clustering after excluding variables with 20% or more missingness and 10% or less or 90% or more prevalence. A total of 389 cases missing 10 or more variables were excluded, and multiple imputation was conducted on the remaining cases. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Differences by cluster in prevalence of each clinical sign and symptom, percentage of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), length of hospital and ICU stay, mortality, and relative frequency over time. RESULTS: Among 8944 included MIS-C cases (median [IQR] patient age, 8.7 [5.0-12.5] years; 5407 [60.5%] male), latent class analysis identified 3 clusters characterized by (1) frequent respiratory findings primarily affecting older children (respiratory cluster; 713 cases [8.0%]; median [IQR] age, 12.7 [6.3-16.5] years), (2) frequent shock and/or cardiac complications (shock and cardiac cluster; 3359 cases [37.6%]; median [IQR] age, 10.8 [7.7-14.0] years), and (3) remaining cases (undifferentiated cluster; 4872 cases [54.5%]; median [IQR] age, 6.8 [3.6-10.3] years). The percentage of patients with MIS-C admitted to the ICU was highest for the shock and cardiac cluster (82.3% [2765/3359]) followed by the respiratory (49.5% [353/713]) and undifferentiated clusters (33.0% [1609/4872]). Among patients with data on length of stay available, 129 of 632 hospitalizations (20.4%) and 54 of 281 ICU stays (19.2%) in the respiratory cluster lasted 10 or more days compared with 708 of 3085 (22.9%) and 157 of 2052 (7.7%), respectively, in the shock and cardiac cluster and 293 of 4467 (6.6%) and 19 of 1220 (1.6%), respectively, in the undifferentiated cluster. The proportion of cases in both the respiratory cluster and the shock and cardiac cluster decreased after emergence of the Omicron variant in the US. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, MIS-C cases clustered into 3 subgroups with distinct clinical phenotypes, severity, and distribution over time. Use of clusters in future studies may support efforts to evaluate surveillance case definitions and identify groups at highest risk for severe outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) commonly requires hospitalization. The Clinical Progression Scale Pediatrics (CPS-Ped) measures level of respiratory support and degree of hypoxia across a range of disease severity, but it has not been applied in infants hospitalized with severe RSV-LRTI. METHODS: We analyzed data from a prospective surveillance registry of infants hospitalized for RSV-related complications across 39 U.S. PICUs from October through December 2022. We assigned CPS-Ped (0=discharged home at respiratory baseline to 8=death) at admission, days 2-7,10, and 14. We identified predictors of clinical improvement (CPS-Ped≤2 or 3-point decrease) by day 7 using multivariable log-binomial regression models and estimated the sample size (80% power) to detect 15% between-group clinical improvement with CPS-Ped versus hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Of 585 hospitalized infants, 138 (23.6%) received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Of the 49 (8.4%) infants whose CPS-Ped score worsened by 2 points after admission, one died. Failure to clinically improve by day 7 occurred in 205 (35%) infants and was associated with age <3 months, prematurity, underlying respiratory condition, and IMV in the first 24 hours in the multivariable analysis. The estimated sample size per arm required for detecting a 15% clinical improvement in a potential study was 584 using CPS-Ped clinical improvement versus 2,031 for hospital LOS. CONCLUSIONS: CPS-Ped can be used to capture a range of disease severity and track clinical improvement in infants who develop RSV-related critical illness and could be useful for evaluating therapeutic interventions for RSV.

Norovirus is the leading cause of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) globally. Few longitudinal studies have assessed norovirus-associated AGE incidence across age groups in community settings in Latin America. During April 2015-April 2019, active surveillance for AGE among community members of all ages was conducted through household visits two to three times per week in San Jeronimo, Cusco, Peru. An asymptomatic control household was selected for every fifth AGE case. Stool specimens were collected from AGE cases, asymptomatic household members, and control household members, and they were tested for norovirus using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Data on illness characteristics were collected from AGE cases during a 15-day follow-up period. Annual means of 247 households and 1,555 participants were enrolled during each April-March surveillance year, accounting for 4,176 person-years (PY) of observation. Of 1,099 AGE events reported, 1,014 stool specimens were tested, and 186 (18%) were norovirus positive. Norovirus AGE incidence was 4.4/100 PY (95% CI: 3.9-5.1); incidence was highest among those younger than 2 years old (60.9/100 PY; 95% CI: 46.8-79.4). Among 672 stool specimens from asymptomatic controls, 56 (8%) tested positive for norovirus. Odds of norovirus detection were significantly higher among cases compared with controls (odds ratio: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.6-3.1). Age-stratified norovirus incidence in this periurban community aligns with previously published estimates and was highest among those younger than 2 years old. Establishing baseline norovirus incidence in specific communities is crucial to identify target populations and assess effectiveness of future interventions, such as vaccines.

During 2023, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended the first respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunizations intended for widespread use in the United States to prevent severe RSV illness in infants and older adults. CDC, in collaboration with federal, public health, and academic partners, is conducting evaluations of real-world effectiveness of recommended RSV immunization products in the United States. Similar frameworks for evaluation are being applied to RSV vaccines and nirsevimab, a long-acting preventative monoclonal antibody, to estimate product effectiveness. The overall goal of CDC's RSV immunization effectiveness program is to generate timely and robust evidence through observational studies to inform immunization product policy decisions and other measures related to RSV prevention and control. CDC is evaluating effectiveness through high-quality, well-controlled observational studies leveraging a variety of platforms that provide robust data to inform policy decisions.

Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) is a rare but serious public health concern. We describe a VRSA case in North Carolina, USA. The isolate from the case belonged to the USA600 lineage and clonal complex 45. No transmission was identified. Confirmed VRSA cases should include a thorough investigation and public health response.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines state that all hospitalized children with suspected or confirmed influenza receive prompt treatment with influenza-specific antivirals. We sought to determine the frequency of, and factors associated with, antiviral receipt among hospitalized children. METHODS: We conducted active surveillance of children presenting with fever or respiratory symptoms from 1 December 2016 to 31 March 2020 at 7 pediatric medical centers in the New Vaccine Surveillance Network. The cohort consisted of children hospitalized with influenza A or B confirmed by clinical or research testing. The primary outcome was frequency of antiviral receipt during hospitalization. We used logistic regression to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with antiviral receipt. RESULTS: A total of 1213 children with laboratory-confirmed influenza were included. Overall, 652 children (53.8%) received an antiviral. Roughly 63.0% of children received clinical influenza testing. Among those with clinical testing, 67.4% received an antiviral. Factors associated with higher odds of antiviral receipt included hematologic (aOR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.03-3.02) or oncologic/immunocompromising (aOR = 2.41; 95% CI = 1.13-5.11) disorders, prehospitalization antiviral receipt (aOR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.49-3.67), clinical influenza testing (aOR = 3.07; 95% CI = 2.28-4.14), and intensive care unit admission (aOR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.02-2.29). Symptom duration >2 days was associated with lower odds of antiviral treatment (aOR = 0.40; 95% CI = .30-.52). Antiviral receipt varied by site with a 5-fold difference across sites. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of children hospitalized with influenza did not receive antivirals. Additional efforts to understand barriers to guideline adherence are crucial for optimizing care in children hospitalized with influenza.

Although most children are spared from developing complications from SARS-CoV-2 infection, some may suffer consequences including Long Covid and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Although the occurrence of these conditions has decreased over time, they can still occur, and recognition of symptoms and prompt diagnosis is imperative for early intervention.

BACKGROUND: Previous investigations into clinical signs and symptoms associated with influenza types and subtypes have not definitively established differences in the clinical presentation or severity of influenza disease. METHODS: The study population included children 0 through 17 years old enrolled at 8 New Vaccine Surveillance Network sites between 2015 and 2020 who tested positive for influenza virus by molecular testing. Demographic and clinical data were collected for study participants via parent/guardian interview and medical chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics by influenza subtype. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess effects of age, sex, influenza subtype, and history of asthma on severity, including hospital admission, need for supplemental oxygen, and length of stay. RESULTS: Retractions, cyanosis, and need for supplemental oxygen were more frequently observed among patients with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. Headaches and sore throat were more commonly reported among patients with influenza B. Children with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and children with asthma had significantly increased odds of hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.39, 95% CI: 1.14-1.69 and AOR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.72-2.67, respectively). During admission, children with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 had significantly increased use of supplemental oxygen compared to children with A(H3N2) (AOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44-0.82) or B (AOR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Among children presenting to the emergency department and admitted to the hospital, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 caused more severe disease compared to influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B. Asthma also contributed to severe influenza disease regardless of subtype.

Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are frequent causes of healthcare-associated infections. Antimicrobial-resistant enterococci pose a serious public health threat, particularly vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), for which treatment options are limited. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion Sentinel Surveillance system conducted surveillance from 2018 to 2019 to evaluate antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and molecular epidemiology of 205 E. faecalis and 180 E. faecium clinical isolates collected from nine geographically diverse sites in the United States. Whole genome sequencing revealed diverse genetic lineages, with no single sequence type accounting for more than 15% of E. faecalis or E. faecium. Phylogenetic analysis distinguished E. faecium from 19 E. lactis (previously known as E. faecium clade B). Resistance to vancomycin was 78.3% among E. faecium, 7.8% among E. faecalis, and did not occur among E. lactis isolates. Resistance to daptomycin and linezolid was rare: E. faecium (5.6%, 0.6%, respectively), E. faecalis (2%, 2%), and E. lactis (5.3%, 0%). All VRE harbored the vanA gene. Three of the seven isolates that were not susceptible to linezolid harbored optrA, one chromosomally located and two on linear plasmids that shared a conserved backbone with other multidrug-resistant conjugative linear plasmids. One of these isolates contained optrA and vanA co-localized on the linear plasmid. By screening all enterococci, 20% of E. faecium were predicted to harbor linear plasmids, whereas none were predicted among E. faecalis or E. lactis. Continued surveillance is needed to assess the future emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance by linear plasmids and other mechanisms.IMPORTANCEThis work confirms prior reports of E. faecium showing higher levels of resistance to more antibiotics than E. faecalis and identifies that diverse sequence types are contributing to enterococcal infections in the United States. All VRE harbored the vanA gene. We present the first report of the linezolid resistance gene optrA on linear plasmids in the United States, one of which co-carried a vanA cassette. Additional studies integrating epidemiological, antimicrobial susceptibility, and genomic methods to characterize mechanisms of resistance, including the role of linear plasmids, will be critical to understanding the changing landscape of enterococci in the United States.

One Health aims to achieve optimal health outcomes for people, animals, plants, and shared environments. We describe a multisector effort to understand and mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk to humans via the spread among and between captive and wild white-tailed deer. We first framed a One Health problem with three governance sectors that manage captive deer, wild deer populations, and public health. The problem framing included identifying fundamental objectives, causal chains for transmission, and management actions. We then developed a dynamic model that linked deer herds and simulated SARS-CoV-2. Next, we evaluated management alternatives for their ability to reduce SARS-CoV-2 spread in white-tailed deer. We found that single-sector alternatives reduced transmission, but that the best-performing alternative required collaborative actions among wildlife management, agricultural management, and public health agencies. Here, we show quantitative support that One Health actions outperform single-sector responses, but may depend on coordination to track changes in this evolving system.

Anthrax is an economically important zoonotic disease affecting both livestock and humans. The disease is caused by a spore forming bacterium, Bacillus anthracis, and is considered endemic to the state of Karnataka, India. It is critical to quantify the role of climatic factors in determining the temporal pattern of anthrax outbreaks, so that reliable forecasting models can be developed. These models will aid in establishing public health surveillance and guide strategic vaccination programs, which will reduce the economic loss to farmers, and prevent the spill-over of anthrax from livestock to humans. In this study, correlation and coherence between time series of anthrax outbreaks in livestock (1987-2016) and meteorological variables and Sea Surface Temperature anomalies (SST) were identified using a combination of cross-correlation analyses, spectral analyses (wavelets and empirical mode decomposition) and further quantified using a Bayesian time series regression model accounting for temporal autocorrelation. Monthly numbers of anthrax outbreaks were positively associated with a lagged effect of rainfall and wet day frequency. Long-term periodicity in anthrax outbreaks (approximately 6-8 years) was coherent with the periodicity in SST anomalies and outbreak numbers increased with decrease in SST anomalies. These findings will be useful in planning long-term anthrax prevention and control strategies in Karnataka state of India.

Influenza C virus (ICV) is an orthomyxovirus related to influenza A and B, yet due to few commercial assays, epidemiologic studies may underestimate incidence of ICV infection and disease. We describe the epidemiology and characteristics of ICV within the New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN), a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-led network that conducts population-based surveillance for pediatric acute respiratory illness (ARI). Nasal or/combined throat swabs were collected from emergency department (ED) or inpatient ARI cases, or healthy controls, between 12/05/2016-10/31/2019 and tested by molecular assays for ICV and other respiratory viruses. Parent surveys and chart review were used to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics of ICV+ children. Among 19,321 children tested for ICV, 115/17,668 (0.7 %) ARI cases and 8/1653 (0.5 %) healthy controls tested ICV+. Median age of ICV+ patients was 18 months and 88 (71.5 %) were ≤36 months. Among ICV+ ARI patients, 40 % (46/115) were enrolled in the ED, 60 % (69/115) were inpatients, with 15 admitted to intensive care. Most ICV+ ARI patients had fever (67.8 %), cough (94.8 %), or wheezing (60.9 %). Most (60.9 %) ARI cases had ≥1 co-detected viruses including rhinovirus, RSV, and adenovirus. In summary, ICV detection was rarely associated with ARI in children, and most ICV+ patients were ≤3 years old with co-detected respiratory viruses.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a severe, post-infectious sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection(1,2), yet the pathophysiological mechanism connecting the infection to the broad inflammatory syndrome remains unknown. Here we leveraged a large set of samples from patients with MIS-C to identify a distinct set of host proteins targeted by patient autoantibodies including a particular autoreactive epitope within SNX8, a protein involved in regulating an antiviral pathway associated with MIS-C pathogenesis. In parallel, we also probed antibody responses from patients with MIS-C to the complete SARS-CoV-2 proteome and found enriched reactivity against a distinct domain of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. The immunogenic regions of the viral nucleocapsid and host SNX8 proteins bear remarkable sequence similarity. Consequently, we found that many children with anti-SNX8 autoantibodies also have cross-reactive T cells engaging both the SNX8 and the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein epitopes. Together, these findings suggest that patients with MIS-C develop a characteristic immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein that is associated with cross-reactivity to the self-protein SNX8, demonstrating a mechanistic link between the infection and the inflammatory syndrome, with implications for better understanding a range of post-infectious autoinflammatory diseases.

While costs of norovirus acute gastroenteritis (AGE) to healthcare systems have been estimated, out-of-pocket and indirect costs incurred by households are not well documented in community settings, particularly in developing countries. We conducted active surveillance for AGE in two communities in Peru: Puerto Maldonado (October 2012-August 2015) and San Jeronimo (April 2015-April 2019). Norovirus AGE events with PCR-positive stool specimens were included. Data collected in follow-up interviews included event-related medical resource utilization, associated out-of-pocket costs, and indirect costs. There were 330 norovirus-associated AGE events among 3,438 participants from 685 households. Approximately 49% of norovirus events occurred among children <5 years of age and total cost to the household per episode was highest in this age group. Norovirus events cost a median of US $2.95 (IQR $1.04-7.85) in out-of-pocket costs and $12.58 (IQR $6.39-25.16) in indirect costs. Medication expenses accounted for 53% of out-of-pocket costs, and productivity losses accounted for 59% of the total financial burden on households. The frequency and associated costs of norovirus events to households in Peruvian communities support the need for prevention strategies including vaccines. Norovirus interventions targeting children <5 years of age and their households may have the greatest economic benefit.

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), caused by infection with the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis, usually manifests as meningitis or septicemia and can be severe and life-threatening (1). Six serogroups (A, B, C, W, X, and Y) account for most cases (2). N. meningitidis is transmitted person-to-person via respiratory droplets and oropharyngeal secretions. Asymptomatic persons can carry N. meningitidis and transmit the bacteria to others, potentially causing illness among susceptible persons. Outbreaks can occur in conjunction with large gatherings (3,4). Vaccines are available to prevent meningococcal disease. Antibiotic prophylaxis for close contacts of infected persons is critical to preventing secondary cases (2).

Background Non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native (NH-AI/AN) people experience a disproportionate incidence of kidney cancer. Nationally aggregated data does not allow for a comprehensive description of regional disparities in kidney cancer incidence among NH-AI/AN communities. This study describes kidney cancer incidence rates and trends among NH-AI/AN compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) populations by geographic region. Methods Using the United States Cancer Statistics American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) Incidence Analytic Database, we calculated age-adjusted incidence rates (per 100,000) of kidney cancers for NH-AI/AN and NHW people for the years 2011-2020 combined using SEER*stat software. Analyses were restricted to non-Hispanic persons living in purchased/referred care delivery area (PRCDA) counties. Average annual percent changes (AAPCs) and trends (1999-2019) were estimated using Joinpoint regression analyses. Results Rates of kidney cancer incidence were higher among NH-AI/AN compared to NHW persons in the U.S. overall and in 5 of 6 regions. Kidney cancer incidence rates also varied by region, sex, age, and stage of diagnosis. Between 1999 and 2019, trends in rates of kidney cancer significantly increased among NH-AI/AN males (AAPC = 2.7%) and females (AAPC = 2.4%). The largest increases in incidence were observed for NH-AI/AN males and females under age 50 and those diagnosed with localized stage disease. Conclusions Study findings highlight growing disparities in kidney cancer incidence rates between NH-AI/AN and NHW populations. Impact: Differences in geographic region, sex, and stage highlight opportunities to decrease prevalence of kidney cancer risk factors and improve access to preventive care.

To explore the effects of climate change on malaria and 20 neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), and potential effect amelioration through mitigation and adaptation, we searched for papers published from January 2010 to October 2023. We descriptively synthesised extracted data. We analysed numbers of papers meeting our inclusion criteria by country and national disease burden, healthcare access and quality index (HAQI), as well as by climate vulnerability score. From 42 693 retrieved records, 1543 full-text papers were assessed. Of 511 papers meeting the inclusion criteria, 185 studied malaria, 181 dengue and chikungunya and 53 leishmaniasis; other NTDs were relatively understudied. Mitigation was considered in 174 papers (34%) and adaption strategies in 24 (5%). Amplitude and direction of effects of climate change on malaria and NTDs are likely to vary by disease and location, be non-linear and evolve over time. Available analyses do not allow confident prediction of the overall global impact of climate change on these diseases. For dengue and chikungunya and the group of non-vector-borne NTDs, the literature privileged consideration of current low-burden countries with a high HAQI. No leishmaniasis papers considered outcomes in East Africa. Comprehensive, collaborative and standardised modelling efforts are needed to better understand how climate change will directly and indirectly affect malaria and NTDs.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii complex (CRAB) and the patients impacted is an important step towards informing better infection prevention and control practices and improving public health response. METHODS: Active, population-based surveillance was conducted for CRAB in 9 U.S. sites from January 1-December 31, 2019. Medical records were reviewed, isolates were collected and characterized including antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: Among 136 incident cases in 2019, 66 isolates were collected and characterized; 56.5% were from cases who were male, 54.5% were from persons of Black or African American race with non-Hispanic ethnicity, and the median age was 63.5 years. Most isolates, 77.2%, were isolated from urine, and 50.0% were collected in the outpatient setting; 72.7% of isolates harbored an acquired carbapenemase gene (aCP), predominantly bla(OXA-23) or bla(OXA-24/40); however, an isolate with bla(NDM) was identified. The antimicrobial agent with the most in vitro activity was cefiderocol (96.9% of isolates were susceptible). CONCLUSIONS: Our surveillance found that CRAB isolates in the U.S. commonly harbor an aCP, have an antimicrobial susceptibility profile that is defined as difficult-to-treat resistance, and epidemiologically are similar regardless of the presence of an aCP.