Last data update: Sep 23, 2024. (Total: 47723 publications since 2009)
Records 1-3 (of 3 Records) |
Query Trace: Brewer TH [original query] |
---|
Needle in a haystack: the yield of syphilis outreach screening at 5 US sites-2000 to 2007
Lewis FM , Schillinger JA , Taylor M , Brewer TH , Blank S , Mickey T , Furness BW , Anschuetz GL , Salmon ME , Peterman TA . J Public Health Manag Pract 2011 17 (6) 513-521 BACKGROUND: Screening for syphilis has been performed for decades, but it is unclear if the practice yields many cases at acceptable cost, and if so, at which venues. We attempted a retrospective study to determine the costs, yield, and feasibility of analyzing health department-funded syphilis outreach screening in 5 diverse US sites with significant disease burdens. METHODS: Data (venue, costs, number of tests, reactive tests, new diagnoses) from 2000 to 2007 were collected for screening efforts funded by public health departments from Philadelphia; New York City; Washington, District of Columbia; Maricopa County, Arizona (Phoenix); and the state of Florida. Crude cost per new case was calculated. RESULTS: Screening was conducted in multiple venues including jails, shelters, clubs, bars, and mobile vans. Over the study period, approximately 926,258 tests were performed and 4,671 new syphilis cases were confirmed, of which 225 were primary and secondary, and 688 were early latent or high-titer late latent. Jail intake screening consistently identified the largest numbers of new cases (including 67.6% of early and high-titer late-latent cases) at a cost per case ranging from $144 to $3,454. Data quality from other venues varied greatly between sites and was often poor. CONCLUSIONS: Though the yield of jail intake screening was good, poor data quality, particularly cost data, precluded accurate cost/yield comparisons at other venues. Few cases of infectious syphilis were identified through outreach screening at any venue. Health departments should routinely collect all cost and testing data for screening efforts so that their yield can be evaluated. |
Infectious syphilis among adolescent and young adult men: implications for human immunodeficiency virus transmission and public health interventions
Brewer TH , Schillinger J , Lewis FM , Blank S , Pathela P , Jordahl L , Schmitt K , Peterman TA . Sex Transm Dis 2010 38 (5) 367-71 BACKGROUND: In 2008, an increase in syphilis among young black men was noted in New York City (NYC), Miami-Fort Lauderdale, and Philadelphia. To explore this trend, we examined infectious syphilis cases from 2000 to 2008 among adolescent and young adult men in these areas. METHODS: Descriptive analysis of male infectious syphilis cases reported to public health authorities in NYC, FL, and Philadelphia. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2008, infectious syphilis cases among males increased in NYC (107-1027 cases), Miami-Fort Lauderdale (109-374), and Philadelphia (41-142). This increase was largely attributable to cases among men who have sex with men. Rates among black adolescent males (15-19 years) increased in NYC ([2.6-43.0]/100,000), Miami-Fort Lauderdale ([5.5-48.1]/100,000), and Philadelphia (]8.3-40.3]/100,000). Among males with infectious syphilis in 2008 in NYC, 9.1% of blacks and 6.6% of Hispanics were adolescents compared with 1.6% of whites (P < 0.001). In Miami-Fort Lauderdale, 12.2% of black males were adolescents compared to 2.0% of whites (P < 0.01) and 2.7% of Hispanics (P < 0.01). Black males dominated all age groups in Philadelphia, but were more likely to be <25 years of age than whites (P = 0.02). Human immunodeficiency virus coinfection rates were 14.8% among adolescent males in NYC, 15.4% in Philadelphia, and 25.0% in Miami-Fort Lauderdale. CONCLUSIONS: Very young black males have emerged as a risk group for syphilis in these 3 areas, as have young Hispanic males in NYC. Many are men who have sex with men and some are already human immunodeficiency virus-infected. Targeted risk reduction interventions for these populations are critical. |
Reinfections during the Florida syphilis epidemic, 2000-2008
Brewer TH , Peterman TA , Newman DR , Schmitt K . Sex Transm Dis 2010 38 (1) 12-7 BACKGROUND: The last 3 syphilis epidemics in the United States peaked after 5 to 6 years, but rates have now increased for 8 years. We questioned whether persons with multiple syphilis diagnoses (repeaters) are fueling the epidemic. METHODS: The Florida Department of Health database of all syphilis cases reported between 2000 and 2008 was used to examine demographics and disease presentation of repeaters and nonrepeaters using bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 26,070 persons diagnosed with syphilis, 643 (2.5%) were repeaters (range, 2-5 diagnoses): 82 women, 444 men who have sex with men (MSM), and 117 men identified as either heterosexual (n = 43) or unknown sexual orientation (n = 74). The mean time between first and second diagnosis was approximately 3 years. Median titer increase among those with a second diagnosis of early latent was 32-fold. In multivariate analysis, compared with nonrepeaters, repeaters were more likely to be MSM (odds ratio [OR], 5.3), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected (OR, 2.0), white (OR, 1.5), ages 35 to 39 (OR, 1.8), and to live in Miami-Dade or Broward Counties (OR, 1.7). Overall, the stage at diagnosis was similar for repeaters, whether it was their initial or subsequent diagnosis. However, HIV-infected MSM were more likely to be diagnosed with early latent at second diagnosis compared with initial diagnosis (P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Most syphilis diagnosed in the current Florida epidemic is among persons infected for the first time. Repeaters are mainly MSM who present with symptoms or large increases in titers. HIV-infected MSM may have higher rates of early asymptomatic disease because of more frequent screening. These are likely to be true new infections. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Sep 23, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure