Adults aged ≥65 years experience the highest risk for COVID-19-related hospitalization and death, with risk increasing with increasing age; outpatient antiviral treatment reduces the risk for these severe outcomes. Despite the proven benefit of COVID-19 antiviral treatment, information on differences in use among older adults with COVID-19 by age group is limited. Nonhospitalized patients aged ≥65 years with COVID-19 during April 2022-September 2023 were identified from the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. Differences in use of antiviral treatment among patients aged 65-74, 75-89, and ≥90 years were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between age and nonreceipt of antiviral treatment. Among 393,390 persons aged ≥65 years, 45.9% received outpatient COVID-19 antivirals, including 48.4%, 43.5%, and 35.2% among those aged 65-75, 76-89, and ≥90 years, respectively. Patients aged 75-89 and ≥90 years had 1.17 (95% CI = 1.15-1.19) and 1.54 (95% CI = 1.49-1.61) times the adjusted odds of being untreated, respectively, compared with those aged 65-74 years. Among 12,543 patients with severe outcomes, 2,648 (21.1%) had received an outpatient COVID-19 antiviral medication, compared with 177,874 (46.7%) of 380,847 patients without severe outcomes. Antiviral use is underutilized among adults ≥65 years; the oldest adults are least likely to receive treatment. To prevent COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality, increased use of COVID-19 antiviral medications among older adults is needed.

Epidemiologic data regarding persons with active tuberculosis (TB) and chronic hepatitis B virus (cHBV) infection are limited because of lack of routine surveillance of cHBV in persons with TB. Potential underdiagnosis of cHBV in California among those with TB is concerning. We matched TB and cHBV registries to identify cHBV infections among persons diagnosed with TB during 2016-2020 and described their demographic characteristics. We calculated expected cHBV cases among persons with TB for each demographic characteristic using published cHBV prevalence estimates for the locations of birth for persons with TB. Estimates were from general or emigrant adult and teen populations. Reported cHBV infection among persons with TB were 23% lower than expected, particularly among Asian persons, persons living in the two healthiest Healthy Places Index quartiles, and residents of less populated jurisdictions in California. Results show the possibility exists for underdiagnosis of cHBV in persons with TB in California.

BACKGROUND: Improved epidemiologic and treatment data for active tuberculosis (TB) with chronic hepatitis B virus (cHBV) infection might inform and encourage screening and vaccination programs focused on persons at risk of having both conditions. METHODS: We matched the California Department of Public Health TB registry during 2016-2020 to the cHBV registry using probabilistic matching algorithms. We used chi-square analysis to compare the characteristics of persons with TB and cHBV with those with TB only. We compared TB treatment outcomes between these groups using modified Poisson regression models. We calculated the time between reporting of TB and cHBV diagnoses for those with both conditions. RESULTS: We identified 8,435 persons with TB, including 316 (3.7%) with cHBV.- Among persons with TB and cHBV, 256 (81.0%) were non-U.S.-born Asian vs 4,186 (51.6%) with TB only (P <0.0001). End-stage renal disease (26 [8.2%] vs 322 [4.0%]; P <0.001) and HIV (21 [6.7%] vs 247 [3.0%]; P value = 0.02) were more frequent among those with TB and cHBV compared with those with TB only. Among those with both conditions, 35 (11.1%) had TB diagnosed >60 days before cHBV (median 363 days) and 220 (69.6%) had TB diagnosed >60 days after cHBV (median 3,411 days). CONCLUSION: Persons with TB and cHBV were found more frequently in certain groups compared with TB only, and infrequently had their conditions diagnosed together. This highlights an opportunity to improve screening and treatment of TB and cHBV in those at high risk for coinfection.

The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) reviewed 109 cases of healthcare personnel (HCP) with laboratory-confirmed mpox to understand transmission risk in healthcare settings. Overall, 90% of HCP with mpox had nonoccupational exposure risk factors. One occupationally acquired case was associated with sharps injury while unroofing a patient's lesion for diagnostic testing.

As of August 2022, clusters of acute severe hepatitis of unknown etiology in children have been reported from 35 countries, including the United States(1,2). Previous studies have found human adenoviruses (HAdVs) in the blood from cases in Europe and the United States(3-7), although it is unclear whether this virus is causative. Here we used PCR testing, viral enrichment based sequencing, and agnostic metagenomic sequencing to analyze samples from 16 HAdV-positive cases from October 1, 2021 to May 22, 2022, in parallel with 113 controls. In blood from 14 cases, adeno-associated virus 2 (AAV2) sequences were detected in 93% (13 of 14), compared to 4 (3.5%) of 113 controls (P<0.001) and to 0 of 30 patients with hepatitis of defined etiology (P<0.001). In controls, HAdV-41 was detected in blood from 9 (39.1%) of the 23 patients with acute gastroenteritis (without hepatitis), including 8 of 9 patients with positive stool HAdV testing, but co-infection with AAV2 was observed in only 3 (13.0%) of these 23 patients versus 93% of cases (P<0.001). Co-infections by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), and/or enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) were also detected in 12 (85.7%) of 14 cases, with higher herpesvirus detection in cases versus controls (P<0.001). Our findings suggest that the severity of the disease is related to co-infections involving AAV2 and one or more helper viruses.

Rabies is an acute encephalitis that is nearly always fatal. It is caused by infection with viruses of the genus Lyssavirus, the most common of which is Rabies lyssavirus. The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) defines a confirmed human rabies case as an illness compatible with rabies that meets at least one of five different laboratory criteria.* Four of these criteria do not depend on the patient's rabies vaccination status; however, the remaining criterion, "identification of Lyssavirus-specific antibody (i.e. by indirect fluorescent antibody...test or complete [Rabies lyssavirus] neutralization at 1:5 dilution) in the serum," is only considered diagnostic in unvaccinated patients. Lyssavirus-specific antibodies include Rabies lyssavirus-specific binding immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies and Rabies lyssavirus neutralizing antibodies (RLNAs). This report describes six patients who were tested for rabies by CDC and who met CSTE criteria for confirmed human rabies because they had illnesses compatible with rabies, had not been vaccinated for rabies, and were found to have serum RLNAs (with complete Rabies lyssavirus neutralization at a serum dilution of 1:5). An additional four patients are described who were tested for rabies by CDC who were found to have serum RLNAs (with incomplete Rabies lyssavirus neutralization at a serum dilution of 1:5) despite having not been vaccinated for rabies. None of these 10 patients received a rabies diagnosis; rather, they were considered to have been passively immunized against rabies through recent receipt of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG). Serum RLNA test results should be interpreted with caution in patients who have not been vaccinated against rabies but who have recently received IVIG.