IMPORTANCE: Preterm infants are recommended to receive most vaccinations at the same postnatal age as term infants. Studies have inconsistently observed an increased risk for postvaccination apnea in preterm infants. OBJECTIVE: To compare the proportions of hospitalized preterm infants with apnea and other adverse events in the 48 hours after 2-month vaccinations vs after no vaccinations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, open-label clinical trial took place at 3 US neonatal intensive care units between August 2018 and October 2021. Infants between 6 and 12 weeks' postnatal age who were born at less than 33 weeks' gestational age and were eligible to receive 2-month vaccines were included. INTERVENTION: Infants were randomized 1:1 to vaccinated (received vaccines within 12 hours of randomization) or unvaccinated (no vaccines received during the study period) groups. Cardiorespiratory data were collected during the 48 hours after vaccination or randomization (unvaccinated group). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was apnea, defined as a respiration pause greater than 20 seconds or a respiration pause greater than 15 seconds with associated bradycardia less than 80 beats per minute. Other outcomes included the number and duration of apnea episodes, serious adverse events, respiratory support escalation, and receipt of positive pressure ventilation. RESULTS: Of 223 randomized infants (117 female; median [range] gestational age, 27.6 [23.0-32.9] weeks), 107 (48%) were vaccinated, and 116 (52%) were unvaccinated. For 2 infants in the vaccinated group, the primary outcome was unable to be assessed. The proportion of infants with 1 or more apnea event was 25 of 105 (24%) in the vaccinated group vs 12 of 116 (10%) in the unvaccinated group (adjusted odds ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.27 to 5.73; P = .01). The mean number of apneic episodes did not significantly differ (model point estimate of difference, 0.54; 95% CI, -0.12 to 1.21) between the vaccinated (2.72) and unvaccinated (2.00) groups. The mean duration of apneic episodes did not significantly differ (model point estimate of difference, 4.6; 95% CI, -5.4 to 14.7) between the vaccinated (27.7) and unvaccinated (32.3) groups. No serious adverse events occurred during the 48-hour monitoring period. Other outcomes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In hospitalized preterm infants, the odds of apnea within 48 hours were higher after 2-month vaccinations vs after no vaccinations. The similar number and duration of apneic events and lack of serious adverse events suggest that current vaccination recommendations for hospitalized preterm infants are appropriate. Neonatal clinicians should continue providing evidence-based anticipatory guidance about postvaccination apnea risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03530124.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection; in the U.S., reporting of MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination is required for vaccine safety monitoring. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was authorized for children aged 5-11 years on October 29, 2021. Covering a period when ∼7 million children received vaccine, surveillance for MIS-C ≤90 days post-vaccination using passive systems identified 58 children with MIS-C and laboratory evidence of past/recent SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 4 without evidence. During a period with extensive SARS-CoV-2 circulation, MIS-C illness in children after COVID-19 vaccination who lacked evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was rare (<1 per million vaccinated children).

BACKGROUND: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) rarely involves delayed giant coronary aneurysms, multiple readmissions or occurrence after COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: We describe a child with all 3 of these unusual features. We discuss his clinical presentation, medical management, review of the current literature and CDC guidance recommendations regarding further vaccinations. RESULTS: A 5-year-old boy had onset of MIS-C symptoms 55 days after COVID-19 illness and 15 days after receiving his first BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination. He was admitted 3 times for MIS-C, and twice after his steroid dose was tapered. On his initial admission, he was given intravenous immunoglobulin and steroids. During his second admission, new, moderate coronary dilation was noted, and he was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and steroids. At his last admission, worsening coronary dilation was noted, and he was treated with infliximab and steroids. During follow-up, he had improvement in his coronary artery dilatation. However, his inflammatory markers increased after steroid wean, and his steroid taper was further extended, after which time his inflammatory markers improved. This is the only such reported case of a patient who was admitted 3 times for MIS-C complications after COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSION: MIS-C rarely involves delayed giant coronary aneurysms, multiple readmissions, or occurrence after COVID-19 vaccination. Whether our patient's COVID-19 vaccine 6 weeks after COVID-19 illness contributed to his MIS-C is unknown. After consultation with the CDC-funded Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Project, the patient's care team decided against further COVID-19 vaccination until at least 3 months post normalization of inflammatory markers.

HIV testing among persons with tuberculosis (TB) results in high-yield identification of persons infected with HIV. To evaluate differences in HIV testing among children versus adults with TB in Vietnam, we collected and analyzed age-disaggregated facility and aggregated provincial data from the National Tuberculosis Program. HIV testing was incompletely documented for >70% of children, whereas adult testing data were >90% complete. Standardized training of personnel for universal HIV testing and documentation for children with TB could improve HIV case-detection and permit linking of children with HIV to antiretroviral treatment to prevent morbidity and mortality.

Children younger than 18 years account for a substantial proportion of patients with tuberculosis worldwide. Available treatments for paediatric drug-susceptible and drug-resistant tuberculosis, albeit generally effective, are hampered by high pill burden, long duration of treatment, coexistent toxic effects, and an overall scarcity of suitable child-friendly formulations. Several new drugs and regimens with promising activity against both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant strains have entered clinical development and are either in various phases of clinical investigation or have received marketing authorisation for adults; however, none have data on their use in children. This consensus statement, generated from an international panel of opinion leaders on childhood tuberculosis and incorporating reviews of published literature from January, 2004, to May, 2014, addressed four key questions: what drugs or regimens should be prioritised for clinical trials in children? Which populations of children are high priorities for study? When can phase 1 or 2 studies be initiated in children? What are the relevant elements of clinical trial design? The consensus panel found that children can be included in studies at the early phases of drug development and should be an integral part of the clinical development plan, rather than studied after regulatory approval in adults is obtained.