Last data update: Jun 03, 2024. (Total: 46935 publications since 2009)
Records 1-11 (of 11 Records) |
Query Trace: Anttila A [original query] |
---|
Implementation of core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes-National Healthcare Safety Network, 2016-2018
Gouin KA , Kabbani S , Anttila A , Mak J , Mungai E , McCray TT , Bell J , Hicks LA , Stone ND . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021 43 (6) 1-5 OBJECTIVE: To assess the national uptake of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes from 2016 to 2018 and the effect of infection prevention and control (IPC) hours on the implementation of the core elements. DESIGN: Retrospective, repeated cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: US nursing homes. METHODS: We used the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Long-Term Care Facility Component annual surveys from 2016 to 2018 to assess nursing home characteristics and percent implementation of the core elements. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate the association between weekly IPC hours and the implementation of all 7 core elements while controlling for confounding by facility characteristics. RESULTS: We included 7,506 surveys from 2016 to 2018. In 2018, 71% of nursing homes reported implementation of all 7 core elements, a 28% increase from 2016. The greatest increases in implementation from 2016 to 2018 were in education (19%), reporting (18%), and drug expertise (15%). In 2018, 71% of nursing homes reported pharmacist involvement in improving antibiotic use, an increase of 27% since 2016. Nursing homes that reported at least 20 hours of IPC activity per week were 14% (95% confidence interval, 7%-20%) more likely to implement all 7 core elements when controlling for facility ownership and affiliation. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing homes reported substantial progress in antibiotic stewardship implementation from 2016 to 2018. Improvements in access to drug expertise, education, and reporting antibiotic use may reflect increased stewardship awareness and resource use among nursing home providers under new regulatory requirements. Nursing home stewardship programs may benefit from increased IPC staff hours. |
Rates of COVID-19 Among Residents and Staff Members in Nursing Homes - United States, May 25-November 22, 2020.
Bagchi S , Mak J , Li Q , Sheriff E , Mungai E , Anttila A , Soe MM , Edwards JR , Benin AL , Pollock DA , Shulman E , Ling S , Moody-Williams J , Fleisher LA , Srinivasan A , Bell JM . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021 70 (2) 52-55 During the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, nursing homes were identified as congregate settings at high risk for outbreaks of COVID-19 (1,2). Their residents also are at higher risk than the general population for morbidity and mortality associated with infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in light of the association of severe outcomes with older age and certain underlying medical conditions (1,3). CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) launched nationwide, facility-level COVID-19 nursing home surveillance on April 26, 2020. A federal mandate issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), required nursing homes to commence enrollment and routine reporting of COVID-19 cases among residents and staff members by May 25, 2020. This report uses the NHSN nursing home COVID-19 data reported during May 25-November 22, 2020, to describe COVID-19 rates among nursing home residents and staff members and compares these with rates in surrounding communities by corresponding U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) region.* COVID-19 cases among nursing home residents increased during June and July 2020, reaching 11.5 cases per 1,000 resident-weeks (calculated as the total number of occupied beds on the day that weekly data were reported) (week of July 26). By mid-September, rates had declined to 6.3 per 1,000 resident-weeks (week of September 13) before increasing again, reaching 23.2 cases per 1,000 resident-weeks by late November (week of November 22). COVID-19 cases among nursing home staff members also increased during June and July (week of July 26 = 10.9 cases per 1,000 resident-weeks) before declining during August-September (week of September 13 = 6.3 per 1,000 resident-weeks); rates increased by late November (week of November 22 = 21.3 cases per 1,000 resident-weeks). Rates of COVID-19 in the surrounding communities followed similar trends. Increases in community rates might be associated with increases in nursing home COVID-19 incidence, and nursing home mitigation strategies need to include a comprehensive plan to monitor local SARS-CoV-2 transmission and minimize high-risk exposures within facilities. |
Facilitators and challenges experienced by nursing homes enrolling in the CDC National Healthcare Safety Network
Braun BI , Longo BA , Thomas R , Bell JM , Anttila A , Shen Y , Morton D , Rowe TA , Stone ND . Am J Infect Control 2020 49 (4) 458-463 BACKGROUND: Standardized measurement of healthcare-associated infections is essential to improving nursing home (NH) resident safety, however voluntary enrollment of NHs in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) requires several steps. We sought to prospectively identify NH structural, process or staff characteristics that affect enrollment and data submission among a cohort of NHs receiving facilitated implementation. METHODS: The evaluation employed a mixed methods approach. The meta-theoretical Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to analyze reported facilitators and challenges. Primary and secondary outcomes were time to NHSN enrollment and data submission, respectively. RESULTS: Of 36 participating NHs, 27 (75%) completed NHSN enrollment and 21 (58%) submitted one or more months of infection data during the 8-month study period. Mean days to complete enrollment was 82 (SD=24, range=51-139) and days to first data submission was 112 (SD=45, range=71-245). Characteristics of NH staff liaisons associated with shorter time to enrollment included infection prevention and control (IPC) knowledge, personal confidence, and responsibility for IPC activities. Facility characteristics were not associated with outcomes. DISCUSSION: Time to NHSN enrollment and submission related more to characteristics of the person leading the process than to characteristics of the NH. CONCLUSIONS: External partnerships that provide real-time support and resources are important assets in promoting successful NH participation in NHSN. |
Implementation of the core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes enrolled in the National Healthcare Safety Network
Palms DL , Kabbani S , Bell JM , Anttila A , Hicks LA , Stone ND . Clin Infect Dis 2019 69 (7) 1235-1238 In 2016, 42% of nursing homes enrolled in the National Healthcare Safety Network reported meeting all 7 of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship. Bivariate analyses suggested that implementation of all core elements differed by ownership type and amount of infection prevention staff hours. |
The National Healthcare Safety Network Long-term Care Facility Component early reporting experience: January 2013-December 2015
Palms DL , Mungai E , Eure T , Anttila A , Thompson ND , Dudeck MA , Edwards JR , Bell JM , Stone ND . Am J Infect Control 2018 46 (6) 637-642 BACKGROUND: In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched the Long-term Care Facility (LTCF) Component of the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) designed for LTCFs to monitor Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs), urinary tract infections (UTIs), infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and infection prevention process measures. METHODS: We describe characteristics and reporting patterns of facilities enrolled in the first 3 years of the surveillance system and rate estimates for CDI, UTI, and MRSA data submitted between 2013 and 2015. RESULTS: From 2013-2015, 279 LTCFs were enrolled and eligible to report to the NHSN with variability in reporting from year to year. Crude rate estimates pooled over these 3 years from reporting facilities were 0.98 incident LTCF-onset CDI cases per 10,000 resident days, 0.59 UTI cases per 1,000 resident days, and 0.10 LTCF-onset MRSA cases per 1,000 resident days. CONCLUSIONS: These initial data demonstrate the capability of the NHSN LTCF Component as a national surveillance system for monitoring infections in LTCFs. Further investigation is needed to understand factors associated with successful enrollment and reporting. As participation increases, data from a larger group of LTCFs will be used to establish national baselines and track prevention goals. |
Health care-associated infections studies project: An American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration
Smith H , Brooks JE , Leaptrot D , Allen-Bridson K , Anttila A , Gross C , Hebden JN , Ryan G , Scalise E , Wright MO . Am J Infect Control 2017 45 (6) 612-614 This case study is part of a series centered on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network's (NHSN) health care-associated infection (HAI) surveillance definitions. The intent of the case study series is to foster standardized application of the NHSN's HAI surveillance definitions among infection preventionists and accurate determination of HAI events. This specific case study focuses on the definitions found within the surgical site infection (SSI) protocol. It aims to reflect the real life and complex patient scenario surrounding a bloodstream infection that is secondary to an SSI and the application of the Present at the Time of Surgery event detail. An online survey link is provided where participants may confidentially answer questions related to the case study and receive immediate feedback in the form of correct answers and explanations and rationales. Details of the case study, answers, and explanations have been reviewed and approved by NHSN staff. We hope that participants take advantage of this educational offering and thereby gain a greater understanding of the NHSN's HAI surveillance definitions. |
Health care-associated infections studies project: An American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration 2016 Case #1
Hebden JN , Leaptrot D , Anttila A , Allen-Bridson K , Brooks JE , Gross C , Scalise E , Wright MO . Am J Infect Control 2016 44 (7) 761-3 This is the first case study published in a series in the American Journal of Infection Control (AJIC) since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/ National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance definition update of 2016. These cases represent some of the complex patient scenarios IPs have encountered in their daily surveillance of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) using NHSN procedural approach and definitions. Case study objectives have been previously published. (1) | With each case, a link to an online survey is provided, where you may enter answers to questions and receive immediate feedback in the form of correct answers and explanations. All individual participant answers will remain confidential, although it is the authors' intention to share a summary of the survey responses at a later date. Cases, answers, and explanations have been reviewed and approved by NHSN staff. We hope that you will take advantage of this offering, and we look forward to your active participation. |
Health care-associated infections studies project case #1: A 2015 American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration
Gross C , Allen-Bridson K , Anttila A , Brooks JE , Hebden JN , Leaptrot D , Morabit S , Wright MO . Am J Infect Control 2015 43 (9) 987-8 This is the first case study published in a series in the American Journal of Infection Control since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance definition update of 2015. These cases reflect some of the complex patient scenarios infection control professionals (ICPs) have encountered in their daily surveillance of health care-associated infections (HAI) using NHSN definitions. |
Health care-associated infections studies project case #2: a 2015 American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration
Allen-Bridson K , Anttila A , Brooks JE , Gross C , Hebden JN , Leaptrot D , Morabit S , Wright MO . Am J Infect Control 2015 43 (10) 1099-101 This is the second case study published in a series in the American Journal of Infection Control since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance definition update of 2015. These cases reflect some of the complex patient scenarios infection control professionals (ICPs) have encountered in their daily surveillance of health care-associated infections (HAIs) using NHSN definitions |
Healthcare-associated infections studies project: an American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration-LabID Clostridium Difficile event 2013
Hebden JN , Anttila A , Allen-Bridson K , Morrell GC , Wright MO , Horan T . Am J Infect Control 2013 41 (10) 916-7 This is the first in a series of case studies that will be published in American Journal of Infection Control following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance definition update of 2013. These cases reflect some of the complex patient scenarios infection professionals encounter during daily surveillance of health care-associated infections using NHSN definitions. Answers to the questions posed and immediate feedback in the form of answers and explanations are available at: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/AJIC-NHSN-LbId2013. All individual participant answers will remain confidential, although it is the authors' hope to share a summary of the findings at a later date. Cases, answers, and explanations have been reviewed and approved by NHSN staff. Active participation is encouraged and recommended. Review/reference Chapter 12-Multidrug-resistant organism &C difficile infection module protocol, of the NHSN Patient Safety Component Manual (http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/12pscMDRO_CDADcurrent.pdf), for information you may need to answer the case study questions. |
National Healthcare Safety Network report, data summary for 2011, device-associated module
Dudeck MA , Horan TC , Peterson KD , Allen-Bridson K , Morrell G , Anttila A , Pollock DA , Edwards JR . Am J Infect Control 2013 41 (4) 286-300 This report is a summary of Device-associated (DA) Module data collected by hospitals participating in the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) for events occurring from January through December 2011 and reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by August 1, 2012. This report updates previously published DA Module data from NHSN and provides contemporary comparative rates.1 This report complements other NHSN reports, including national and state-specific reports of standardized infection ratios (SIRs) for select healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).2,3,4 | NHSN data collection, reporting, and analysis are organized into three components: Patient Safety, Healthcare Personnel Safety, and Biovigilance, and use standardized methods and definitions in accordance with specific module protocols.5,6,7 Institutions may use modules singly or simultaneously, but once selected, they must be used for a minimum of one calendar month for the data to be included in CDC analyses. All infections are categorized using standard CDC definitions that include laboratory and clinical criteria.7 The DA Module may be used by facilities other than hospitals, including outpatient dialysis centers. A report of data from this module for outpatient dialysis centers was published separately.8 NHSN facilities contributing HAI surveillance data to this report did so voluntarily, in response to state mandatory reporting requirements or in compliance with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program. CDC aggregated these data into a single national database for 2011, consistent with the stated purposes of NHSN, which were to: | Collect data from a sample of healthcare facilities in the United States to permit valid estimation of the magnitude of adverse events among patients and healthcare personnel. | Collect data from a sample of healthcare facilities in the United States to permit valid estimation of the adherence to practices known to be associated with prevention of these adverse events. | Analyze and report collected data to permit recognition of trends. | Provide facilities with risk-adjusted metrics that can be used for inter-facility comparisons and local quality improvement activities. | Assist facilities in developing surveillance and analysis methods that permit timely recognition of patient and healthcare worker safety problems and prompt intervention with appropriate measures. | Conduct collaborative research studies with NHSN member facilities (e.g., describe the epidemiology of emerging healthcare-associated infection [HAI] and pathogens, assess the importance of potential risk factors, further characterize HAI pathogens and their mechanisms of resistance, and evaluate alternative surveillance and prevention strategies). | Comply with legal requirements – including but not limited to state or federal laws, regulations, or other requirements – for mandatory reporting of healthcare facility-specific adverse event, prevention practice adherence, and other public health data. | Enable healthcare facilities to report HAI and prevention practice adherence data via NHSN to the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in fulfillment of CMS’s quality measurement reporting requirements for those data. | Provide state departments of health with information that identifies the healthcare facilities in their state that participate in NHSN. | Provide to state agencies, at their request, facility-specific, NHSN patient safety component and healthcare personnel safety component adverse event and prevention practice adherence data for surveillance, prevention, or mandatory public reporting. | Patient- and facility-specific data reported to CDC are kept confidential in accordance with sections 304, 306, and 308(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 USC 242b, 242k, and 242m(d)). |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Jun 03, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure